Cited by

¶ 5, (“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the trial court’s findings and determine whether there was evidence that reasonably supports the court’s findings.”).

However, we “defer to the trial court’s determination of witnesses’ credibility and the weight to give conflicting evidence.” (“Even though conflicting evidence may exist, we affirm the trial court’s ruling if substantial evidence supports it.”).

Law P. 82(A) (2016); , 348 ¶ 14

We “defer to the court’s determination of witnesses’ credibility and the weight to give conflicting evidence.” ¶ 13 (App. 1998).

- 50, ¶¶ 26-27 (App. 1998) (stating a party’s failure to provide evidence of a claimed expenses precluded the trial court from considering it in its ruling).

¶ 5, (“The trial court’s apportionment of community property will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion.”).

See, ¶ 6 (App. 1998) (citing A.R.S.

“We will defer to the [family] court’s determination of witnesses’ credibility and the weight to give conflicting evidence.” We cite the current version of applicable statutes when no revisions material to this decision have occurred.

§ 25- 319(A)(1); ¶ 17 (App. 1998) (noting spousal maintenance may be awarded where any one of the four factors listed in A.R.S.

Sec., ¶ 8, –48, ¶ 13, –81 (App. 1998).

Nevertheless, our duty “does not include re- weighing conflicting evidence.” ¶ 16, (citation omitted); -48, ¶ 13, -81 (App. 1998) (deferring to the trial court’s determination of the witnesses’ credibility and the weight accorded to conflicting evidence); Hamilton v. Mun.