DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Marriage of Gutierrez v. Gutierrez, 972 P.2d 676.

599 citing documents.

  • Tumlinson v. Tumlinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Potts v. Potts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Potts v. Potts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    ¶ 13 (App. 1998) (appellate court defers to the superior court's "determination of witnesses' credibility and the weight to give conflicting evidence"); see also Danielson, 201 Ariz. at 406, ¶ 13.
  • Bonafede v. Giannangelo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Bonafede v. Giannangelo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Eastman v. Eastman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Eastman v. Eastman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Honeywell v. Kilgore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Honeywell v. Kilgore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    4 ¶ 13 (1999); -48, ¶ 13 (App. 1998).
  • Mead v. Mead Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Mead v. Mead Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Ekvall v. Estrada Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Ekvall v. Estrada Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Krenzen v. Katz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Krenzen v. Katz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Wagner v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Wagner v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Swett v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Swett v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    -48, ¶ 13, -81 (App. 1998) (deferring to the trial court’s determination of witnesses’ credibility and the weight accorded to conflicting evidence and holding that reasonable evidence supported a finding); Hamilton v. Municipal Court (Mesa), (holdi
  • Vogue v. Maleknia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Vogue v. Maleknia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    -55, ¶¶ 9, 13, -34 (App. 2007) (viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the wife and affirming the spousal maintenance award without requiring her to first “use up” her property); ¶ 14, (affirming lifetime spousal maintenance to a wife whose age and skill level precluded her from gaining employment adequate to support herself).
  • Bmo Harris v. Thruston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Bmo Harris v. Thruston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    -48, ¶ 13, -81 (App. 1998).
  • Strovink v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Pesetsky v. Pesetsky Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Pesetsky v. Pesetsky Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Strovink v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    -48, ¶ 13, -81 (App. 1998); see also Jesus M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
  • Shano v. Shano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Shano v. Shano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Helland v. Helland 337 P.3d 562 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Helland v. Helland 337 P.3d 562 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Shifflett v. Porter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Shifflett v. Porter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    L.L.C., ¶ 41, (stating we give deference to the trial court's opportunity to judge the credibility of the witnesses, and will not reweigh the evidence on appeal); Father asserts in the “Conclusion” section of his opening brief that the court’s award of attorneys’ fees to Mother improperly sanctioned him for “taking his case to trial.” However, Father presents no argument to support this assertion.
  • Robinson v. Hutchins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Dominguez v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Dominguez v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Robinson v. Hutchins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Kennedy Johnson v. Payne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Kennedy Johnson v. Payne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    ed to his attorney, Gallagher, “that there would be no defense for his community property if there [was a] determination of fraud.” After hearing all the testimony, the superior court found that Husband “was defending or hiring an attorney to defend in part the potential liability against the community.” We defer to the superior court’s assessment of conflicting testimony, -48, ¶ 13, -81 (App. 1998), and hold that reasonable evidence supported its finding that part of Husband’s motivation in hir
  • Berkley v. Koenig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Berkley v. Koenig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    ¶ 13, (reweighing evidence); -48, ¶ 13, -81 (App. 1998) (witness credibility).
  • Laroya v. Laroya Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Laroya v. Laroya Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Kang v. Kang Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Kang v. Kang Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    We review the award of spousal maintenance for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 9, and, in doing so, view the evidence in the light most favorable to Mother, ¶ 14
  • Myrick v. Maloney 333 P.3d 818 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
  • Myrick v. Maloney 333 P.3d 818 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
    § 25-324(A); see Mangan, 258 P.3d at 171
  • Gazeley v. Larsen-Gazeley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Gazeley v. Larsen-Gazeley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    -47, ¶¶ 5, 8, -80 (App. 1998).
  • Cohen v. Cohen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014