Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Marriage of Gutierrez v. Gutierrez, 972 P.2d 676.
- Jackson v. Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Bassal v. Khalil Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Bassal v. Khalil
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-47, ¶¶ 7-8 (App. 1998).
- Seguridad v. Wheeler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Seguridad v. Wheeler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Brooks v. cardoza/braswell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Dapra v. Robertson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Brooks v. cardoza/braswell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Dapra v. Robertson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Zakrezewski v. Zakrezewski Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Zakrezewski v. Zakrezewski
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶ 13 (App. 1998); Great W. Bank v. LJC Dev., LLC, ¶ 42 (App. 2015).
- Rosenbaum v. Lovely Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Rosenbaum v. Lovely Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Vargas v. Vargas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Vargas v. Vargas
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶9 We review a spousal maintenance award for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 9 (App. 2007), and affirm if there is any reasonable evidence to support it, ¶ 14 (App. 1998).
- Zennaro v. Zennaro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Zennaro v. Zennaro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Murdock v. Bustamante Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Murdock v. Bustamante Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Valasekova v. Fedor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Valasekova v. Fedor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Bonam v. Bonam Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Bonam v. Bonam
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶10 But it is a party’s burden to present evidence, not the court’s. See Troutman v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz., (“The party who asserts a fact has the burden to establish that fact.”); ¶ 27 (App. 1998) (A party cannot fail to offer certain evidence and then complain that the superior court abused its discretion by ignoring that evidence.).
- Bellamy v. Bellamy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Bellamy v. Bellamy
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶ 1, n.1 (App. 2007); ¶ 13 (App. 1998).
- Poage v. Brooks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Poage v. Brooks
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Where evidence is conflicting, “[w]e will defer to the trial court’s determination of witnesses’ credibility and the weight to give conflicting evidence.” ¶ 13 (App. 1998).
- North Scottsdale v. Core Center Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
North Scottsdale v. Core Center
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶ 13 (App. 1998); see also Kocher v. Dep’t of Revenue, ¶ 9 (App. 2003) (“A finding of fact is not clearly erroneous if substantial evidence supports it, even if substantial conflicting 12 NORTH SCOTTSDALE v. CORE CENTER, et al.
- State v. Marinakis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- State v. Marinakis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Dawson v. Dawson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Dawson v. Dawson
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶ 13 (App. 1998) (explaining we defer to the trial court’s determination of witness credibility and weighing of conflicting evidence).
- Garza v. Collinsworth Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Garza v. Collinsworth
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶ 13 (App. 1998) (“The evidence in this case was conflicting.
- Muhammad v. Muhammad Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Muhammad v. Muhammad
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
It is true that a spouse may have a claim for reimbursement against “abnormal or excessive expenditures” of community funds by the other spouse upon showing that the community funds were “waste[d].” ¶ 7 (App. 1998).
- Tinoco v. Tinoco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Tinoco v. Tinoco
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
We thus review the superior court’s decision regarding whether changed circumstances exist for an abuse of discretion because it is a factual inquiry, see id., and defer to the superior court sitting as fact finder, –48, ¶ 13 (App. 1998).
- Swanson v. Swanson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Swanson v. Swanson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Goodwin v. Goodwin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Goodwin v. Goodwin
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In any event, this court “defer[s] to the trial court’s determination of witnesses’ credibility and the weight to give conflicting evidence.” ¶ 13 (App. 1998); (“If an expert fails to calculate the value of an asset according to standard methodology, that failure goes to the weight of the expert’s opinion.”).
- Hopkins v. Hopkins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Hopkins v. Hopkins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Li v. Zhao Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Li v. Zhao
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶ 13 (App. 1998) (deferring to the family court on determinations of witness credibility and the weight given to conflicting evidence).
- Alexander v. Stadsklev Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Alexander v. Stadsklev Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Acuna v. Pineda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023