Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re Marriage of Pownall, 5 P.3d 911.

198 citing documents.

Doctor v. Potter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Doctor v. Potter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶ 18 (App. 2009) (sanctions); ¶ 26 (App. 2000) (attorneys’ fees).
Mikalacki v. Rubezic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Mikalacki v. Rubezic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶ 25 n.5 (App. 2000) (holding issues raised for the first time in a reply brief are waived).
Barnett v. Barnett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Barnett v. Barnett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Zambezi v. Proforma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Zambezi v. Proforma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
v. Microsoft Corp., ¶ 17 (App. 2006); 583, ¶¶ 7, 26 (App. 2000).
Abriani v. Slaughter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Abriani v. Slaughter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Stewart v. Stewart Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Stewart v. Stewart Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Jurgen M., Ashley C. v. Dcs, E.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Jurgen M., Ashley C. v. Dcs, E.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Even if he had not waived the issue by raising it for the first time in his reply, n.5, ¶ 25 (App. 2000), it is not supported by the record.
Gaslight Inn v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Gaslight Inn v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 25 n.5 (App. 2000) (holding issues raised for the first time in a reply brief are waived).
Myers, Jr. v. Freed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Myers, Jr. v. Freed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
h issue presented for review, with supporting reasons for each contention, and with citations of legal authorities and appropriate references to the portions of the record on which the appellant relies”); ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (explaining the failure to develop and support an argument on appeal results in waiver of the issue); ¶ 25 n.5 (App. 2000) (holding issues raised for the first time in a reply brief are waived).
Dole v. Dole Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Dole v. Dole Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Horst v. Horst Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Horst v. Horst Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 10 (App. 2019) (validity and enforceability of a contract); ¶ 15 (App. 2000) (characterization of property).
Bejarano v. Ortiz-Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Bejarano v. Ortiz-Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Porteous v. Francies Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Porteous v. Francies Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Pickett v. Borg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Tarascio v. Siebers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Pickett v. Borg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
We typically do not consider arguments raised for the first time in reply, ¶ 25 n.5 (App. 2000), and we will not do so here.
Tarascio v. Siebers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 26 (App. 2000) (-95 (1995)).
Boyle v. Malta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Boyle v. Malta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Parmeley v. Carr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sunburst Farms v. Braden Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sunburst Farms v. Braden Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 25 n. 5 (App. 2000) (holding issues raised for the first time in a reply brief are waived).
Parmeley v. Carr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Dole v. Hon. blair/dole 463 P.3d 849 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Dole v. Hon. blair/dole 463 P.3d 849 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Ignatova v. Ignatov Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Ignatova v. Ignatov Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Hefner v. Hefner 456 P.3d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Hefner v. Hefner 456 P.3d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Morris v. Morris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Defrancesco v. Defrancesco 455 P.3d 722 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Defrancesco v. Defrancesco 455 P.3d 722 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Morris v. Morris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Hammett v. Hammett 453 P.3d 1145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Hammett v. Hammett 453 P.3d 1145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sunflower v. Ahcccs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sunflower v. Ahcccs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019