Cited by

See In re Marriage of Pownall , , 580-81, ¶ 10, , 914-15 (App. 2000) (factors indicative of substantive unconscionability of a premarital separation agreement are "contract terms so one-sided as to oppress or unfairly surprise an innocent party," "as well as 'an overall imbalance in the obligations and rights imposed by the bargain' " (qu

“Arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are deemed waived.” ¶ 25 n.5 (App. 2000) ().

¶ 15 (App. 2000) (“The characterization of the property .

¶ 4 (App. 2007); ¶ 15 (App. 2000).

While Arizona allows courts to credit to one spouse the benefit of living rent-free in the marital residence in making an equitable division of property, -83, ¶¶ 23-25 (App. 2000), equity did not require the trial court to offset Wife’s responsibility in paying the community debt here.

In re Marriage of Pownall , , 583, ¶ 29, , 917 (App. 2000).

¶ 15 (App. 2000); see also Pullen, 223 Ariz. at 295-96, ¶ 9.

See, ¶¶ 23-25 , (superior court appropriately accounted for benefit of living rent-free in marital residence during separation in making equitable division of property).

¶ 31, (citation omitted).