Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., 6 P.3d 315.

94 citing documents.

  • Stephanie Burkett v. John and Anita Dryja Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
  • Stephanie Burkett v. John and Anita Dryja Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
    Co., see also Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶¶ 27, 37 (App. 2000) (explaining that fees are authorized “only when the tort could not exist ‘but for’ the breach or avoidance of contract”).
  • Brown v. Arizona Natures Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Brown v. Arizona Natures Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    To determine whether a claim arises out of contract, this court will consider “the fundamental nature of the action rather than the mere form of the pleadings.” Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 27 (App. 2000).
  • Eli v. Procaccianti Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Eli v. Procaccianti Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 12 (App. 2000).
  • Martinez v. Blake Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Martinez v. Blake Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    A tort claim arises out of contract “only when the tort could not exist ‘but for’ the breach or avoidance of contract.” Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 27 (App. 2000); see also Sparks v. Republic Nat.
  • Titlemax v. Fornaris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Titlemax v. Fornaris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    § 12-341.01 may apply to authorize an award of fees in tort cases, see, e.g., Ramsey Air Meds., L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., -16, ¶¶ 27-29 (App. 2000), Fornaris does not contend that such circumstances are present here, and so 7 TITLEMAX v. FORNARIS Decision of the Court has failed to justify his request.
  • Fleming v. Fripps Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Fleming v. Fripps Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 27 (App. 2000).
  • Mago v. Arizona Escrow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Mago v. Arizona Escrow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    even in the absence of a contract.” Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Air Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 27 (App. 2000).
  • Zubia v. Shapiro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Zubia v. Shapiro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    See Ramsey Air Meds., L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., – 16, ¶ 27 (App. 2000).
  • Whitmer v. Hilton Casitas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Whitmer v. Hilton Casitas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 12 (App. 2000).
  • Zahler v. Swift Transportation Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Zahler v. Swift Transportation Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    Cf. Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., –16, ¶¶ 27–29 (App. 2000) (Negligent tortfeasor owes duty of care even in the absence of a contract so an award of fees under A.R.S.
  • Jarron Smith v. Town of Marana 524 P.3d 254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
  • Jarron Smith v. Town of Marana 524 P.3d 254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
    Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc.
  • Aspen v. Wakefield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Aspen v. Wakefield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    See Modular Mining Sys., Inc. v. Jigsaw Techs., Inc., ¶ 23 (noting difficulties in arising-out-of-contract analysis); Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 19 (App. 2000) (same).
  • Todeschi v. Arreola Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Todeschi v. Arreola Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    not be committed without an insurance contract and a breach thereof, and thus, was “so intrinsically related to the contract” that the action arose out of contract); ¶¶ 17-18 (App. 2003) (explaining fee statute applies if a contract is an “essential basis” of the action and not merely a “factual predicate”); Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 27 (App. 2000) (stating “the court should look to the fundamental nature of the action rather than the mere form of the pleadings”).
  • Synergy v. Singh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Synergy v. Singh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    See Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter 12 SYNERGY, et al. v. SINGH, et al. Decision of the Court Aviation, Inc., ¶ 17 (App. 2000) (“A tort claim does not come within the attorneys’ fee statute by being interwoven with an unsuccessful contract claim.” (emphasis in original)).
  • Tms v. Zachariah Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Tms v. Zachariah Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    See Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 17 (App. 2000) (“It is well-established that a successful party on a contract claim may recover not only attorneys’ fees expended on the contract claim, but also fees expended in litigating an ‘interwoven’ tort claim.”).
  • Calhoun v. Midfirst Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Calhoun v. Midfirst Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., –16, ¶ 27 (App. 2000).
  • Camelot v. Genaro's Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Camelot v. Genaro's Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    Ramsey Air Meds, LLC v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., -16, ¶ 27 (App. 2000).
  • Emp v. Prieto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Emp v. Prieto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    Ramsey Air Meds, LLC. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 12 (App. 2000).
  • Fields v. Eorp Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Fields v. Eorp Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 12 (App. 2000).
  • SK Builders, Inc. v. Smith 436 P.3d 519 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2019
  • SK Builders, Inc. v. Smith 436 P.3d 519 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2019
    Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc. , , ¶ 27
  • Jones v. Denning Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Jones v. Denning Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    See Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 27 (App. 2000) ("[A] tort claim will 'arise out of a contract' only when the tort could not exist 'but for' the breach or avoidance of contract.
  • Bell & 63rd v. Auto-Owners Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Bell & 63rd v. Auto-Owners Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 12 (App. 2000).
  • Buxton v. Butler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Buxton v. Butler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    § 12-341.01(A) to Buxton’s claims is a question that “requires us to consider the voluminous and sometimes confusing case law interpreting the statutory phrase ‘arising out of a contract,’” Ramsey Air Meds, LLC v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 18 (App. 2000), and one which we review de novo, id.
  • US Bank, N.A. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. 398 P.3d 118 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • US Bank, N.A. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. 398 P.3d 118 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    See Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 12 (App. 2000).
  • Gillespie v. Wallace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Gillespie v. Wallace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    “It is well-established that a successful party on a contract claim may recover not only attorneys’ fees expended on the contract claim, but also fees expended in litigating an ‘interwoven’ tort claim.” Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 17 (App. 2000).