Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., 6 P.3d 315.
-
Gillespie v. Wallace
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“It is well-established that a successful party on a contract claim may recover not only attorneys’ fees expended on the contract claim, but also fees expended in litigating an ‘interwoven’ tort claim.” Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 17 (App. 2000).
- Blackhawk v. McComb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Blackhawk v. McComb
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 17 (App. 2000).
- Glasser v. M&O Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Glasser v. M&O
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Ramsey Air Meds., L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc.
- Deepwater v. Wells Fargo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Deepwater v. Wells Fargo
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Agency, ¶ 33, (quoting Ramsey Air Meds, LLC v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 27, P.3d 275 (2008)).
- Four Seas v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Four Seas v. Brown
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Ramsey Air Meds., L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 12, (citation omitted).
- Swett v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Swett v. Brown
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 45, Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 12
- Kamela v. One West Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Kamela v. One West
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Fund, Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., -16, ¶ 27, -21 (App. 2000).
- Austin v. W. Surprise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Austin v. W. Surprise
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
thin tortious striking range” cannot convert tort claims 8 AUSTIN et al. v. W. SURPRISE et al. Decision of the Court into contract claims, a tort claim may arise out of a contract “when the tort could not exist ‘but for’ the breach or avoidance of contract.” Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C., v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., –16, ¶ 27, –21 (App. 2000); see also Sparks v. Republic Nat.
- Vortex v. denkewicz/engelhard 334 P.3d 734 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- ML Servicing Co. v. Coles 334 P.3d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Vortex v. denkewicz/engelhard
334 P.3d 734
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Ramsey Air Meds, LLC v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 12
-
ML Servicing Co. v. Coles
334 P.3d 745
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶31 The test to determine if an action arises out of contract is whether the plaintiff would have a claim “even in the absence of a contract.” See Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., –16, ¶ 27, –21 (App. 2000).
- Meritage v. Bingham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Meritage v. Bingham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Rudinsky v. Harris 290 P.3d 1218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
-
Rudinsky v. Harris
290 P.3d 1218
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
See Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 17 , Bennett v. Baxter Group, Inc., -20, ¶ 21 , -36 (App.2010).
- Caruthers v. Underhill 287 P.3d 807 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
-
Caruthers v. Underhill
287 P.3d 807
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Hanley, 204 Ariz. at 151, ¶ 18 , 61 P.3d at 33 ; Ramsey Air Meds, LLC v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., -16, ¶ 27 , -21 (App.2000).
- Assyia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 273 P.3d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
-
Assyia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
273 P.3d 668
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 12 , (citing Hampton v. Glendale Union High Sch.
- North Peak Construction, LLC v. Architecture Plus, Ltd. 254 P.3d 404 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
-
North Peak Construction, LLC v. Architecture Plus, Ltd.
254 P.3d 404
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
See id.; see also Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 31 , (stating that “[t]he duty of performing in a ‘workmanlike’ manner is a duty implied by law”).
- Dooley Corvallas Development Corp. v. O'Brien 244 P.3d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
-
Dooley Corvallas Development Corp. v. O'Brien
244 P.3d 586
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
And as this court noted in Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 27 , “[t]he existence of a contract that merely puts the parties within tortious striking range of each other does not convert ensuing torts into contract claims.” Put differently, “[w]hen the duty breached is one implied by law based on the relationship of the parties, that claim so
- Bennett James L. Bennett Money Purchase Pension Plan Meyerstein v. Baxter Group Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
-
Bennett James L. Bennett Money Purchase Pension Plan Meyerstein v. Baxter Group
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Section 12-341.01(A) allows parties to recover “reasonable attorney fees” for contested claims “arising out of a contract.” Its application “is a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo.” Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc.
- Zeagler v. Buckley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
-
Zeagler v. Buckley
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
v. Jigsaw Tech., quoting Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc.
- Keystone Floor & More, LLC v. Arizona Registrar of Contractors 219 P.3d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
-
Keystone Floor & More, LLC v. Arizona Registrar of Contractors
219 P.3d 237
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass’n, ¶ 34 , Ramsey Air Meds., L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 12
- Modular Mining Systems, Inc. v. Jigsaw Technologies, Inc. Olson Blacutt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
-
Modular Mining Systems, Inc. v. Jigsaw Technologies, Inc. Olson Blacutt
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Section 12-341.01(A) provides that, in “any contested action arising out of a contract, express or implied, the court may award the successful party reasonable attorney fees.” The applicability of § 12-341.01(A) “is a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo.” Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc.
- Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass'n 167 P.3d 1277 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
-
Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass'n
167 P.3d 1277
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 12
- State Ex Rel. Goddard v. Gravano 108 P.3d 251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
-
State Ex Rel. Goddard v. Gravano
108 P.3d 251
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 12
- Premium Cigars Intern. v. Farmer-Butler-Leavitt Ins. 96 P.3d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
-
Premium Cigars Intern. v. Farmer-Butler-Leavitt Ins.
96 P.3d 555
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., , 15 ¶ 27