Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., 6 P.3d 315.

94 citing documents.

Blackhawk v. McComb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Blackhawk v. McComb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 17 (App. 2000).
Glasser v. M&O Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Glasser v. M&O Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Ramsey Air Meds., L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc.
Deepwater v. Wells Fargo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Deepwater v. Wells Fargo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Agency, ¶ 33, (quoting Ramsey Air Meds, LLC v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 27, P.3d 275 (2008)).
Four Seas v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Four Seas v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Ramsey Air Meds., L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 12, (citation omitted).
Swett v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Swett v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 45, Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 12
Kamela v. One West Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Kamela v. One West Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Fund, Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., -16, ¶ 27, -21 (App. 2000).
Austin v. W. Surprise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Austin v. W. Surprise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
thin tortious striking range” cannot convert tort claims 8 AUSTIN et al. v. W. SURPRISE et al. Decision of the Court into contract claims, a tort claim may arise out of a contract “when the tort could not exist ‘but for’ the breach or avoidance of contract.” Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C., v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., –16, ¶ 27, –21 (App. 2000); see also Sparks v. Republic Nat.
Vortex v. denkewicz/engelhard 334 P.3d 734 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
ML Servicing Co. v. Coles 334 P.3d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Vortex v. denkewicz/engelhard 334 P.3d 734 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Ramsey Air Meds, LLC v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 12
ML Servicing Co. v. Coles 334 P.3d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶31 The test to determine if an action arises out of contract is whether the plaintiff would have a claim “even in the absence of a contract.” See Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., –16, ¶ 27, –21 (App. 2000).
Meritage v. Bingham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Meritage v. Bingham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Rudinsky v. Harris 290 P.3d 1218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Rudinsky v. Harris 290 P.3d 1218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
See Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 17 , Bennett v. Baxter Group, Inc., -20, ¶ 21 , -36 (App.2010).
Caruthers v. Underhill 287 P.3d 807 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Caruthers v. Underhill 287 P.3d 807 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Hanley, 204 Ariz. at 151, ¶ 18 , 61 P.3d at 33 ; Ramsey Air Meds, LLC v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., -16, ¶ 27 , -21 (App.2000).
Assyia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 273 P.3d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Assyia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 273 P.3d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 12 , (citing Hampton v. Glendale Union High Sch.
North Peak Construction, LLC v. Architecture Plus, Ltd. 254 P.3d 404 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
North Peak Construction, LLC v. Architecture Plus, Ltd. 254 P.3d 404 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
See id.; see also Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 31 , (stating that “[t]he duty of performing in a ‘workmanlike’ manner is a duty implied by law”).
Dooley Corvallas Development Corp. v. O'Brien 244 P.3d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Dooley Corvallas Development Corp. v. O'Brien 244 P.3d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
And as this court noted in Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 27 , “[t]he existence of a contract that merely puts the parties within tortious striking range of each other does not convert ensuing torts into contract claims.” Put differently, “[w]hen the duty breached is one implied by law based on the relationship of the parties, that claim so
Bennett James L. Bennett Money Purchase Pension Plan Meyerstein v. Baxter Group Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Bennett James L. Bennett Money Purchase Pension Plan Meyerstein v. Baxter Group Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Section 12-341.01(A) allows parties to recover “reasonable attorney fees” for contested claims “arising out of a contract.” Its application “is a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo.” Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc.
Zeagler v. Buckley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Zeagler v. Buckley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
v. Jigsaw Tech., quoting Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc.
Keystone Floor & More, LLC v. Arizona Registrar of Contractors 219 P.3d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Keystone Floor & More, LLC v. Arizona Registrar of Contractors 219 P.3d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass’n, ¶ 34 , Ramsey Air Meds., L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 12
Modular Mining Systems, Inc. v. Jigsaw Technologies, Inc. Olson Blacutt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Modular Mining Systems, Inc. v. Jigsaw Technologies, Inc. Olson Blacutt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Section 12-341.01(A) provides that, in “any contested action arising out of a contract, express or implied, the court may award the successful party reasonable attorney fees.” The applicability of § 12-341.01(A) “is a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo.” Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc.
Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass'n 167 P.3d 1277 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass'n 167 P.3d 1277 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 12
State Ex Rel. Goddard v. Gravano 108 P.3d 251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
State Ex Rel. Goddard v. Gravano 108 P.3d 251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 12
Premium Cigars Intern. v. Farmer-Butler-Leavitt Ins. 96 P.3d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Premium Cigars Intern. v. Farmer-Butler-Leavitt Ins. 96 P.3d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., , 15 ¶ 27

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by