Cited by

The superior court abuses its discretion when “the record fails to provide substantial support for its decision or the court commits an error of law in reaching the decision.” ¶ 3 (App. 2004) (citation omitted).

¶ 1, 514 ¶¶ 9–10 (App. 2010) (addressing termination of probation); –9 ¶¶ 1–2 (App. 2004) (addressing order releasing defendant from incarceration); (addressing denial of motion to withdraw from a plea agreement, and concluding a “‘substantial right’ is implicated because the state ordinarily may withdraw from a plea agreement when the

¶ 3 (App. 2004); ¶ 2 (App. 2001).

¶ 12 (App. 1999); ¶ 3 (App. 2004).

A court abuses its discretion when the reasons given for its decision are unsupported by the record, “clearly untenable, legally incorrect, or amount to a denial of justice.” ¶ 14 (App. 2019); ¶ 3 (App. 2004).

¶ 14 (App. 2019); ¶ 3 (App. 2004).

§ 13-105(5); ¶ 14 (App. 2004).

¶ 3 (App. 2004) ("Generally, a court abuses its discretion where the record fails to provide substantial support for its decision or the court commits an error of law in reaching the decision."

¶ 3 (App. 2004) (“Generally, a court abuses its discretion where the record fails to provide substantial support for its decision[.]”) ( ¶ 2 (App. 2001)).

“A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching its decision.” ¶ 13 (App. 2016) ( ¶ 3 (App. 2004)).

§ 13-756; ¶ 3 (App. 2004).

¶ 3 (App. 2004) (citation omitted).5 In determining whether the trial court abused its discretion we acknowledge that the United States Constitution guarantees defendants “a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense.” ¶ 36 (App. 2016) (quoting State v. Machado, 224 A