Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-6831, 748 P.2d 785.

120 citing documents.

In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to E.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to E.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Walter S. v. Elisa P., E.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Walter S. v. Elisa P., E.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Action No. JS-6831, (“[T]ermination cannot be predicated solely on the best interests of the child.”).
Brionna J. v. Dcs, A.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Brionna J. v. Dcs, A.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Action No. JS- 6831, (citation omitted).
Kara B. v. Dcs, A.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Kara B. v. Dcs, A.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Action No. JS-6831, (“In most cases, the presence of a statutory ground will have a negative effect on the child[.]”).
Monice C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Monice C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jeanna T. v. Dcs, A.I. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jeanna T. v. Dcs, A.I. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Action No. JS-6831, ("In most cases, the 4 Mother testified that Redemption Psychiatry resumed in-person services in August and that she had an appointment scheduled for October.
Michael C., Tyana T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Michael C., Tyana T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Desiree v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Desiree v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Action No. JS-6831, ("In most cases, the presence of a statutory ground will have a negative effect on the children.").
Timothy B., Michael M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Timothy B., Michael M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jessica L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jessica L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Cassie F., Warren M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Cassie F., Warren M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Action No. JS-6831, ("In most cases, the presence of a statutory ground will have a negative effect on the children.").
Ashley C. v. Joseph B., H.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Ashley C. v. Joseph B., H.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Action No. JS-6831, ("Although the best interests of the child are not sufficient to grant 5 ASHLEY C. v. JOSEPH B., H.B.
Gabriel A., Heather M. v. Dcs, G.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Gabriel A., Heather M. v. Dcs, G.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Action No. JS-6831, ("In most cases, the presence of a statutory ground will have a negative effect on the children.").
Richard R. v. Daisy A., I.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Richard R. v. Daisy A., I.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Salynda H., Paul T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Julian D. v. McKenzi W., M.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Julian D. v. McKenzi W., M.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Salynda H., Paul T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Action No. JS-6831, (finding the existence of a statutory ground for severance that negatively effects a child to be relevant to the best-interests analysis).
Haley W., Gary W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Haley W., Gary W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Brandon H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Brandon H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Shoshawna S. v. Dcs, K.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Shoshawna S. v. Dcs, K.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
A.R. v. Dcs, Jessica S. 439 P.3d 1183 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
A.R. v. Dcs, Jessica S. 439 P.3d 1183 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Juana C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Juana C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Denisse P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Denisse P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Manuel T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Manuel T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Nicholios N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Nicholios N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Action No. JS–6831, (“In most cases, the presence of a statutory ground will have a negative effect on the children[,]” which supports a best interests finding.).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by