Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In re Sabino R., 10 P.3d 1211.

80 citing documents.

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Lemaire 395 P.3d 1116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Lemaire 395 P.3d 1116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Passmore v. McCarver 395 P.3d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Passmore v. McCarver 395 P.3d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Ortega Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Ortega Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
201;3 ¶ 4 (App. 2000) (“[Rule 201] allows [the Court of Appeals] to take judicial notice of anything of which the trial court could take notice”); State of Arizona, http://www.printablee.com/postpic/2015/06/detailed-arizona- map_183580.jpg (last visited Nov.
Tp Racing v. Simms Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Tp Racing v. Simms Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(holding that “[i]t is proper for a court to take judicial notice of its own records or those of another action tried in the same court,” and an appellate court may “take judicial notice of anything of which the trial court could take notice, even if the trial court was never asked to take notice”).
State of Arizona v. Lee L.N. 340 P.3d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Lee L.N. 340 P.3d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
392, ¶¶ 19-21, (noting defendant failed to object in trial court to “nature or sufficiency” of state’s evidence, which included uncertified copies of delinquency adjudication minute entries and notice of repeat felony offender status, and conceded at hearing he could not say minute entries were inaccurate copies of juvenile court record); ¶¶ 4-5, (superior courts authorized to take judicial notice of their own records, including juvenile court records, to establish facts necessary to matters bef
State v. Jaramillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Jaramillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Medley v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Medley v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 4, (An appellate court may “take judicial notice of anything of which the trial court could take notice,” including the superior court’s “own records or those of another action tried in the same court.”).
Shurts v. Shurts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Shurts v. Shurts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
201(b); ¶ 4, (appellate court can "take judicial notice of anything of which the trial court could take notice, even if the trial court was never asked to take notice").
Schugg v. Az Brd of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Schugg v. Az Brd of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 4, (noting “[i]t is proper for a court to take judicial notice of its own records or those of another action tried in the same court,” and that Arizona Rule of Evidence 201 “allows [appellate courts] to take judicial notice of anything of which the trial court could take notice
State of Arizona v. Gregory Charles Rhome 333 P.3d 786 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Gregory Charles Rhome 333 P.3d 786 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State v. Eskivel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Eskivel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 4, (“It is proper for a court to take judicial notice of its own records or those of another action tried in the same court,” and an appellate court may “take judicial notice of anything of which the trial court could take notice, even if the trial court was never asked to take n
Sitton v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. 311 P.3d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Sitton v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. 311 P.3d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Reeck v. Mendoza 304 P.3d 1122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Reeck v. Mendoza 304 P.3d 1122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
See In re Sabino R„ ¶ 4 , (appellate court may take judicial notice of anything of which superior court could take notice).
Catalina Foothills Unif. Sch. Distr. No. 16 v. La Paloma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Catalina Foothills Unif. Sch. Distr. No. 16 v. La Paloma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
(court may properly take judicial notice of its own records).
In Re Mh 2008-002393 221 P.3d 1054 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
In Re Mh 2008-002393 221 P.3d 1054 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009