Cited by

¶ 4 (App. 2000) (An appellate court may take judicial notice of other actions tried in the same court.).

¶ 4 (App. 2000) (“[T]his court [may] take judicial notice of anything of which the trial court could take notice .

The superior court implicitly took judicial notice of the Department Orders when ruling that the inevitable discovery doctrine applied because Cash was going into custody and “her possessions would necessarily be inventoried at jail.” We may “take judicial notice of anything of which the trial court could take notice.” ¶ 4 (App. 2000).

¶ 4 (App. 2000) (“It is proper for a court to take judicial notice of its own records or those of another action tried in the same court.”); Ariz. R. Evid.

401; (“It is proper for a court to take judicial notice of its own records or those of another action tried in the same court.”).

¶ 4 (App. 2000) (“[Arizona Rule of Evidence 201] allows this court to take judicial notice of anything of which the trial court could take notice, even if the trial court was never asked to take notice.

¶ 4 (App. 2000); Ariz. R. Evid.

¶ 4 (App. 2000) (noting appellate court may “take judicial notice of anything of which the [superior] court could take notice”).

Although we may take judicial notice of documents in other court cases, ¶ 4 (App. 2000), the records Father provides or asks us to locate have little bearing on the issues relevant to this appeal.

¶ 4 (App. 2000) (A court may “take judicial notice of its own records or those of another action tried in the same court.”).

¶ 4 (App. 2000) (holding appellate court can take judicial notice of trial court records).

¶ 4 (App. 2000); RAJI (Criminal) STCI 34.0541 (3d ed. 2013).

¶ 4 (App. 2000) (holding appellate court can take judicial notice of trial court records).

Sentence modification only requires a remand if it would affect a substantial right of 2 ¶ 4 (App. 2000) (Arizona Rule of Evidence 201 allows appeals court to take notice of anything of which trial court could have taken notice).

¶¶ 4–5 (App. 2000) (appellate court may take judicial notice of superior court records).

¶ 4 (App. 2000); Ariz. R. Evid.

(appellate court reviewed superior court records from other cases relating to the defendant); (holding that “[i]t is proper for a court to take judicial notice of its own records or those of another action .

¶ 4 (App. 2000) (appellate courts may take judicial notice of anything which the superior court could take notice of, including the superior court’s “own records or those of another action tried in the same court”).

When he refused to pay 1 We take judicial notice of the record in Odigwe I. ¶ 4 (App. 2000) (the superior court may take judicial notice of another action tried in the same court, and an appellate court may take judicial notice of anything of which the superior court could take notice).

¶ 4, (under Ariz. R. Evid.