Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re John M., 36 P.3d 772.

50 citing documents.

In Re Delinquency of J.U. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
In Re Delinquency of J.U. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 7 (App. 2001) (“[W]e will only reverse on the grounds of insufficient evidence if there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the judgment or if the judgment is contrary to any substantial evidence.”).
Samuel P. v. Mindy D., A.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Samuel P. v. Mindy D., A.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
(This court will not disturb the superior court’s order unless “there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the judgment or .
In Re Ruben P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
In Re Ruben P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
In Re Riley A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
In Re Riley A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
We will reverse on grounds of insufficient evidence only if “there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the judgment or if the judgment is contrary to any substantial evidence.” ¶ 7 (App. 2001) (citation omitted).
State v. Sanders Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Sanders Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
In Re Christian S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
In Re Christian S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-67, ¶ 6 (App. 2010) ( ¶ 7 (App. 2001)).
In Re Eliodoro M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
In Re Eliodoro M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
This court will reverse for insufficient evidence only if “there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the judgment or if the judgment is contrary to any substantial evidence.” ¶ 7 (App. 2001).
In Re Tien F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
In Re Tien F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-67, ¶ 6 (App. 2010) ( ¶ 7 (App. 2001)).
In Re Angel M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
In Re Angel M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
In Re Isaiah A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
In Re Isaiah A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
In Re R.E. 387 P.3d 1288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
In Re R.E. 387 P.3d 1288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
“[W]e will not re-weigh the evidence, and we will only reverse on the grounds of insufficient evidence if there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the judgment or if the judgment is contrary to any substantial evidence.”
Adrian E. v. Department of Child Safety 369 P.3d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Adrian E. v. Department of Child Safety 369 P.3d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
see also Manuel M., 181 P.3d at 1131; Adrian E. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Frank R. v. Mother Goose Adoptions 367 P.3d 88 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Frank R. v. Mother Goose Adoptions 367 P.3d 88 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
see also Manuel M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
In Re Justice M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
In Re Justice M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
In Re: Tianna S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
In Re: Tianna S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶2 Viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the juvenile court’s orders, the evidence shows that on March 4-7, 2014 Tianna violated her probation.
In Re Fernando R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
In Re Fernando R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State of Arizona v. Marcus Deshaun Tucker, Clifton James Cuttler II and Andre Lavelle Armstrong 290 P.3d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
State of Arizona v. Marcus Deshaun Tucker, Clifton James Cuttler II and Andre Lavelle Armstrong 290 P.3d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
In re John M., 201 Ariz. 424, ¶ 7
In Re Eric W. 271 P.3d 486 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
In Re Eric W. 271 P.3d 486 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
In Re Nickolas S. 245 P.3d 446 Ariz. 2011
In Re Nickolas S. 245 P.3d 446 Ariz. 2011
See Camby, 701 P.2d at 502 ; , 428 ¶ 20, (affirming delinquency adjudication based on racial slurs “likely to provoke a violent reaction when addressed to an ordinary citizen of African-American descent.”); , 86 ¶ 8, (juvenile’s derogatory language to principal
In re Amber S. 238 P.3d 632 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
In re Amber S. 238 P.3d 632 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
In Re Nickolas S. 226 P.3d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
In Re Nickolas S. 226 P.3d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
In Re Reymundo F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
In Re Reymundo F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
In Re Natalie Z. 153 P.3d 1081 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
In Re Natalie Z. 153 P.3d 1081 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
In Re James P. 153 P.3d 1049 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
In Re James P. 153 P.3d 1049 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
“[W]e view the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the adjudication.” ¶ 7 , (-3, ¶ 6 , -85 (2000)).
In re Ubaldo B. 81 P.3d 334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
In re Ubaldo B. 81 P.3d 334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
2 When reviewing the adjudication, “we will not re-weigh the evidence, and we will only reverse on the grounds of insufficient evidence if there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the judgment or if the judgment is contrary to any substantial evidence.” ¶7 , (citation omitted).