Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re Andrew C., 160 P.3d 687.

47 citing documents.

In Re Joseph G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
In Re Joseph G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
In Re Marissa C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
In Re Marissa C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
In Re: Gage K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
In Re: Gage K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
In Re Monteith C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
In Re Monteith C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
In Re Colson D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
In Re Colson D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Cassie F., Warren M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Cassie F., Warren M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
In Re Kaden V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
In Re Kaden V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
In Re Braden C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
In Re Braden C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Aaron L. v. Dcs, S.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Aaron L. v. Dcs, S.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 6 (App. 2007); Willie G. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
In Re Jesus C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
In Re Jesus C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 9 (App. 2007) ( ¶ 7 (2002)); ¶ 4 (App. 1999) (applying relevant legal principles of adult restitution to analysis of juvenile restitution).
In Re Reynaldo P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
In Re Reynaldo P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 9 (App. 2007); see 3 We have examined our own jurisdiction.
In Re Cheyenne H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
In Re Cheyenne H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
–3, ¶ 6 (2000); ¶ 6 (App. 2007).
In Re J.U. 384 P.3d 839 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
In Re J.U. 384 P.3d 839 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Marianne N. v. Department of Child Safety 381 P.3d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Marianne N. v. Department of Child Safety 381 P.3d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
We review constitutional issues de novo, ¶ 6 (App. 2007) (citation omitted), noting the burden of proving unconstitutionality rests with Mother, Planned Parenthood Ariz., Inc. v. Am.
In Re Corey K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
In Re Corey K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
rder the juvenile to make full or partial restitution to the victim of the offense for which the juvenile was adjudicated delinquent.” Restitution is appropriate for a victim’s losses that, first, “are economic,” second, “would not have occurred but for the juvenile’s delinquent conduct,” and third, “are directly caused by the delinquent conduct (e.g. not consequential damages).” ¶ 9, 160 P.3d, 687, 689 ( ¶ 7, ).
State v. Garcia 258 P.3d 195 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State v. Garcia 258 P.3d 195 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
¶ 21 , (“Frequently, hypothetical examples shed light on the viability, or lack thereof, of an asserted legal principle.”).
In Re Eddie O. 253 P.3d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
In Re Eddie O. 253 P.3d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
¶ 21 , (“Frequently, hypothetical examples shed light on the viability, or lack thereof, of an asserted legal principle.”).
Strait v. Strait 224 P.3d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Strait v. Strait 224 P.3d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
¶ 21 , ("Frequently, hypothetical examples shed light on the viability, or lack thereof, of an asserted legal principle.").
AZTAR CORP. v. US Fire Ins. Co. 224 P.3d 960 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
AZTAR CORP. v. US Fire Ins. Co. 224 P.3d 960 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
¶ 21 , ("Frequently, hypothetical examples shed light on the viability, or lack thereof, of an asserted legal principle.").
In Re Mh 2008-002596 219 P.3d 242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
In Re Mh 2008-002596 219 P.3d 242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
¶ 21 , (“[H]ypothetical examples shed light on the viability, or lack thereof, of an asserted legal principle.”).
In Re Brendan G. 212 P.3d 830 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
In Re Brendan G. 212 P.3d 830 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
In Re Michelle G. 173 P.3d 1041 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
In Re Michelle G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
In Re Michelle G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
“We review a juvenile court’s restitution order for an abuse of discretion.”
In Re Michelle G. 173 P.3d 1041 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
‘We review a juvenile court’s restitution order for an abuse of discretion.”
In Re Tiffany O. 174 P.3d 282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007