Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Christy C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 153 P.3d 1074.

257 citing documents.

Allegra G., Kasongo T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to N.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Sec., –52, ¶ 19 (App. 2007) ().
Allegra G., Kasongo T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Sec., ¶ 21 (App. 2007) (citing cases).
Atkison v. Shafer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Atkison v. Shafer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., –52, ¶ 19 (App. 2007), but its findings must include the “ultimate facts,” Ruben M., 230 Ariz. at 241, ¶ 25.
Shani R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Shani R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., –52, ¶ 19 (App. 2007) (“[W]e affirm the trial court’s order if the facts at trial support the trial court’s findings whether or not each supportive fact is specifically called out by the trial court in its findings.”) ().
Stella H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Stella H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2007) (citation omitted).
Jesse R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Jesse R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2007) (cleaned up).
Nina v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Nina v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Keira A. v. Dcs, A.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Keira A. v. Dcs, A.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2007) (cleaned up).
Adrienne D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Adrienne D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., ¶ 12 (App. 2007), and we will affirm so long as reasonable evidence supports the order, Jordan C. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Nathan L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Nathan L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., ¶ 12 (App. 2007), and will affirm the termination order unless "no one could reasonably find the evidence supporting statutory grounds for termination to be clear and convincing," ¶ 25 (App. 2019) (quoting Jordan C., 223 Ariz. at 93, ¶ 18).
In Re Pima County Mental Health Case No. Mh20200860 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
In Re Pima County Mental Health Case No. Mh20200860 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
Sec., (party may not sit back and not call trial court’s attention to critical issue, and then urge on appeal that critical issue as grounds for reversal).
Blue Palo v. Kimbrough Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Blue Palo v. Kimbrough Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Perez v. Richardson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Perez v. Richardson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., -52 ¶ 19 (App. 2007); -48 ¶ 136 (App. 1998).
Bernardino v. Dcs, J.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Bernardino v. Dcs, J.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jessie D. v. dcs/f v. m.D./m.D./c.D. Ariz. 2021
Jessie D. v. dcs/f v. m.D./m.D./c.D. Ariz. 2021
Harry W. v. Dcs, L.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Harry W. v. Dcs, L.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2007) (cleaned up).
Jacoree D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jacoree D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 10 (App. 2007) (noting superior court’s findings that a parent “would have to show a period of sobriety for at least a year and participate in several services, particularly as to [her] substance abuse histories”).
Juan F. v. Erica C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Juan F. v. Erica C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2007) ().
Antonio R. v. Dcs, A.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Antonio R. v. Dcs, A.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2007) (citation omitted).
Kaleb P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Kaleb P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2007) ().
Tawni A., Seth M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Julieann S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Julieann S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., –52, ¶ 19 (App. 2007).
Tawni A., Seth M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., –52, ¶ 19 (App. 2007).
Jose F. v. Dcs, A.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jose F. v. Dcs, A.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2007) ().
Andrea F., Joshua W. v. Dcs, E.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Andrea F., Joshua W. v. Dcs, E.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
In a dependency proceeding, as with termination, the superior court need not detail every fact that supports its ruling, ―52, ¶ 19 9 ANDREA F., JOSHUA W. V. DCS, E.W.
Asaunte W. v. Dcs, N.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Asaunte W. v. Dcs, N.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2007) ().
Roseann R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by