Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Christy C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 153 P.3d 1074.

257 citing documents.

Roseann R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 15 (App. 2007)).
Steven P., Ashley P. v. Dcs, A.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Aprilleann H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Aprilleann H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶¶ 20–21 (App. 2007) (applying waiver to issues relating to alleged insufficiency of findings first raised on appeal).
Steven P., Ashley P. v. Dcs, A.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2007) ().
Timothy B., Michael M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Timothy B., Michael M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jessica L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Charles v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jessica L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Charles v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Cassie F., Warren M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Cassie F., Warren M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 21 (App. 2007); ("[A]bsent extraordinary circumstances, errors not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal.").
Mark O. v. Dcs, A.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Mark O. v. Dcs, A.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Melissa S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Melissa S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2007) ().
Jasmine H. v. Brian H., B.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jayson v. v. Dcs, A.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jasmine H. v. Brian H., B.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2007) ().
Jayson v. v. Dcs, A.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 21 (App. 2007) (finding a mother waived her claim that the juvenile court failed to make required findings by failing to object in the juvenile court).
Lindy S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Lindy S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2007) ().
Francine C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Francine C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶14 Although the juvenile court does not have to detail each fact that supports its ruling, -52, ¶ 19 (App. 2007), its findings must include all of the “ultimate facts,” Ruben M., 230 Ariz. at 241, ¶ 25.
Harmony F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Harmony F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Matthew C. v. Dcs, M.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Matthew C. v. Dcs, M.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., -52, ¶ 19 (App. 2007).
Jessi N., Ryan J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jessi N., Ryan J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Yessica R., Efrain R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Yessica R., Efrain R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 15 (App. 2007)).
Selina Z. v. Dcs, D.Z. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Selina Z. v. Dcs, D.Z. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 17 (App. 2007) (noting that because incarceration severely limits the services DCS can provide, it “will as a practical matter typically preclude all but minimal visits.”).
Hefner v. Hefner 456 P.3d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Hefner v. Hefner 456 P.3d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Michael M. v. Anita P., M.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Michael M. v. Anita P., M.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Chavez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Chavez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶¶ 20- 21 (App. 2007) (“[A] party may not ‘sit back and not call the trial court’s attention to the lack of a specific finding on a critical issue, and then urge on appeal that mere lack of a finding on that critical issue as a grounds for reversal.’” (quoting Bayless Inv.
Jared D. v. Dcs, G.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Jared D. v. Dcs, G.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., –52, ¶ 19 (App. 2007) (citation omitted).
Amanda B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Amanda B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., -52, ¶ 19 (App. 2007).
Amberlayne S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Amberlayne S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., -52, ¶ 19 (App. 2007) ("When considering the [juvenile] court's express findings, we affirm the [juvenile] court's order if the facts at trial support the [juvenile] court's findings whether or not each supportive fact is specifically called out by the [juvenile] court in its findings.").
Aleise H. v. Dcs 432 P.3d 928 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Aleise H. v. Dcs 432 P.3d 928 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 21 (App. 2007)).
Ricardo R. v. Lori C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018