Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Kimu P. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 178 P.3d 511.

79 citing documents.

In Re Termination of Parental Rights as to A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
In Re Termination of Parental Rights as to A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Sec., ¶ 19 n.3 (App. 2008) (noting that a parent waives an argument by failing to raise it in the juvenile court).
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.P. and M.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.P. and M.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Sec., ¶ 19 n.3 (App. 2008) (arguments not raised in the superior court are waived on appeal).
In Re Dependency as to L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In Re Dependency as to L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Sec., ¶ 19 n.3 (App. 2008), as DCS argues, we find no abuse of the superior court’s discretion.
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to C.C. and N.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to C.C. and N.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Sec., ¶ 19 n.3 (App. 2008) (noting that arguments “not raised in the juvenile court” are waived on appeal).
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to S.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to S.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Sec., ¶ 12 (App. 2008) (finding evidence related to a child born during dependency proceedings irrelevant to the older children’s best interests); see also Cassandra S. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, 1 CA-JV 21-0003, 2021 WL 2434266, at *2, ¶ 17 (Ariz. App. June 15, 2021) (mem.
Mikalacki v. Rubezic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Mikalacki v. Rubezic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., ¶ 11 (App. 2008) (citation omitted).
Miller v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Miller v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Brandon J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Brandon J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 11 (App. 2008) (”We will not disturb a trial court’s ruling on the admission or exclusion of evidence unless a clear abuse of discretion is present and prejudice results therefrom.”).
Georgina L. v. Lynda R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Georgina L. v. Lynda R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Soldwedel v. Soldwedel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Soldwedel v. Soldwedel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Tasha R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Tasha R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 10 (App. 2008) (emphasis added; citation omitted).
In Re: Mh2020-001729 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
In Re: Mh2020-001729 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 11 (App. 2008) (quotation omitted).
Murillo v. Tuckett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Murillo v. Tuckett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 6, n.3 (App. 2008) (noting the court of appeals does not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal).
Barton v. Barton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Barton v. Barton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 19 n.3 (App. 2008) (applying waiver to issues relating to “alleged procedural defects” first raised on appeal); Cecilia A. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Eboney H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Eboney H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 19 n.3 (App. 2008) (noting the court of appeals does not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal).
Bradley H. v. Dcs, L.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Bradley H. v. Dcs, L.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 19 n.3 (App. 2008).
Michaela F., Brian F. v. Benjamin A., T.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Michaela F., Brian F. v. Benjamin A., T.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 11 (App. 2008) (citation omitted); ¶ 4 (App. 2009) (A court abuses its discretion when it “misapplies the law or exercises its discretion based on incorrect legal principles.”).
Shad C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Shad C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 19 n.3 (App. 2008) (declining to review arguments not raised in the juvenile court) (citing Paloma Inv.
Keith R. v. Dcs, A.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Keith R. v. Dcs, A.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Ricky G. v. Priscilla G., A.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Ricky G. v. Priscilla G., A.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 19 n.3 (App. 2008) (noting that a parent waives an argument by failing to raise it in the juvenile court); see also Shawanee S. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Dcs v. Hon. stocking-tate/mark R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Dep't of Child Safety v. Stocking-Tate 446 P.3d 813 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Dep't of Child Safety v. Stocking-Tate 446 P.3d 813 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
41, ¶ 5, , 513 (App. 2008) ; Michael J., Jr. v. Michael J., Sr. , , 155, ¶ 4, , 961 (App. 2000).
Dcs v. Hon. stocking-tate/mark R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 5 (App. 2008); Michael J., Jr. v. Michael J., Sr., ¶ 4 (App. 2000).
Aleise H. v. Dcs 432 P.3d 928 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Aleise H. v. Dcs 432 P.3d 928 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., n.3 (App. 2008) (applying waiver to issues relating to “alleged procedural defects” first raised on appeal); Christy C., 214 Ariz. at 452 ¶¶ 20–21 (applying waiver to issues relating to alleged insufficiency of findings first raised on appeal).
Logan B. v. Dcs 422 P.3d 1072 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Logan B. v. Dcs 422 P.3d 1072 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., n.3, ¶ 19 (App. 2008) (applying waiver to issues relating to “alleged procedural defects” that were not raised in the juvenile court); Christy C., 214 Ariz. at 452, ¶ 21 (finding waiver as to sufficiency of findings).
Nona P. v. Charles W., E.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Nona P. v. Charles W., E.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 10, (quotations and citation omitted).