Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Antonio P. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 187 P.3d 1115.

63 citing documents.

In RE TERM OF PARENTAL RIGHTS AS TO M.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Jorden B. v. Dcs, L.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Jorden B. v. Dcs, L.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Linsay A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Linsay A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Kristina H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Kristina H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Patricia S. v. Dcs, E.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Patricia S. v. Dcs, E.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Michael D. v. Dcs, R.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Michael D. v. Dcs, R.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Eboney H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Eboney H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 12 (App. 2008) (holding court must consider statutory placement preferences when placement is at issue).
Perla M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Perla M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Gal for P.T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Gal for P.T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 7 (App. 2008) (order changing custody of dependent child is final, appealable order).
Matthew J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Matthew J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 8 (App. 2008) (citing A.R.S.
Lawrence T. v. Dcs, M.T. 438 P.3d 259 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Lawrence T. v. Dcs, M.T. 438 P.3d 259 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 13 (App. 2008) (noting that we will not “enlarge, stretch, expand, or extend” statutes, nor will we “read meaning into a statute that is not within the legislature’s ‘manifest intention .
Dcs, S.P. v. Juan P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Dcs, S.P. v. Juan P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jennifer R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jennifer R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Brittany W., Ryan W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Brittany W., Ryan W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jewel C. v. Dep't of Child Safety 418 P.3d 1120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
Jewel C. v. Dep't of Child Safety 418 P.3d 1120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
¶ 12, , 1118 (App. 2008).
State v. Preayer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Preayer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Michelle F. v. Dcs, M.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Michelle F. v. Dcs, M.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Tyren T., Brittany H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Tyren T., Brittany H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 8 (App. 2008) (“[T]he court’s primary consideration in dependency cases is the best interest of the child.”); Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Jeff D. v. Department of Child Safety 367 P.3d 109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jeff D. v. Department of Child Safety 367 P.3d 109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
James M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
James M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Lorenz v. State 364 P.3d 475 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Lorenz v. State 364 P.3d 475 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
J.S., E.K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
J.S., E.K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Aurora M. v. Dcs, B.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Aurora M. v. Dcs, B.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Rene Castro v. Hon. Peter J. Hochuli C.C. 343 P.3d 457 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
Rene Castro v. Hon. Peter J. Hochuli C.C. 343 P.3d 457 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
Sec., cf. Cardon v. Cotton Lane Holdings, Inc., (accepting special action jurisdiction in part because relief would end litigation and “spare[] the parties and the judicial system unnecessary time and expense”).
David F., Michelle F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
David F., Michelle F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Angel O. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014