Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Antonio P. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 187 P.3d 1115.

62 citing documents.

Jorden B. v. Dcs, L.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Jorden B. v. Dcs, L.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Linsay A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Linsay A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Kristina H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Kristina H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Patricia S. v. Dcs, E.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Patricia S. v. Dcs, E.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Michael D. v. Dcs, R.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Michael D. v. Dcs, R.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Eboney H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Eboney H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 12 (App. 2008) (holding court must consider statutory placement preferences when placement is at issue).
Perla M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Perla M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Gal for P.T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Gal for P.T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 7 (App. 2008) (order changing custody of dependent child is final, appealable order).
Matthew J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Matthew J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 8 (App. 2008) (citing A.R.S.
Lawrence T. v. Dcs, M.T. 438 P.3d 259 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Lawrence T. v. Dcs, M.T. 438 P.3d 259 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 13 (App. 2008) (noting that we will not “enlarge, stretch, expand, or extend” statutes, nor will we “read meaning into a statute that is not within the legislature’s ‘manifest intention .
Dcs, S.P. v. Juan P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Dcs, S.P. v. Juan P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jennifer R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jennifer R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Brittany W., Ryan W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Brittany W., Ryan W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jewel C. v. Dep't of Child Safety 418 P.3d 1120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
Jewel C. v. Dep't of Child Safety 418 P.3d 1120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
¶ 12, , 1118 (App. 2008).
State v. Preayer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Preayer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Michelle F. v. Dcs, M.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Michelle F. v. Dcs, M.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Tyren T., Brittany H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Tyren T., Brittany H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 8 (App. 2008) (“[T]he court’s primary consideration in dependency cases is the best interest of the child.”); Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Jeff D. v. Department of Child Safety 367 P.3d 109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jeff D. v. Department of Child Safety 367 P.3d 109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
James M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
James M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Lorenz v. State 364 P.3d 475 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Lorenz v. State 364 P.3d 475 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
J.S., E.K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
J.S., E.K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Aurora M. v. Dcs, B.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Aurora M. v. Dcs, B.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Rene Castro v. Hon. Peter J. Hochuli C.C. 343 P.3d 457 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
Rene Castro v. Hon. Peter J. Hochuli C.C. 343 P.3d 457 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
Sec., cf. Cardon v. Cotton Lane Holdings, Inc., (accepting special action jurisdiction in part because relief would end litigation and “spare[] the parties and the judicial system unnecessary time and expense”).
David F., Michelle F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
David F., Michelle F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Angel O. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Angel O. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014