Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Shawanee S. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 319 P.3d 236.

316 citing documents.

Rodney L., Deana L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Rodney L., Deana L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., (“A parent who does not object [to the adequacy of services] in the juvenile court is precluded from challenging that finding on appeal.”).
Richard P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Richard P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., -79, ¶¶ 13- 16 (App. 2014).
Faith P. v. Dcs, L.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Faith P. v. Dcs, L.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 16 (App. 2014) ( and 3 Absent material changes from the relevant date, we cite the current version of rules and statutes.
Jimmy F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jimmy F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., –79, ¶¶ 16, 18 (App. 2014), DCS argues that Father waived any argument about inadequate reunification services because he did not raise his concerns in the juvenile court.
Destiny F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Destiny F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶¶ 17-18 (App. 2014) (applying waiver when parent offered no challenge to services, either before the termination hearing or at the hearing itself).
Selina Z. v. Dcs, D.Z. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Selina Z. v. Dcs, D.Z. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶¶ 13–14 (App. 2014) (finding that a parent must raise a challenge to the adequacy of services in the juvenile court).
Ricky G. v. Priscilla G., A.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Ricky G. v. Priscilla G., A.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., (holding it was incumbent on the parent to promptly raise concerns to the juvenile court about the adequacy of reunification services and her failure to do so constituted waiver of the right to challenge it on appeal).
Jessie D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Krystle M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Krystle M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Jessie D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶¶ 17–18 (App. 2014) (failure to give the juvenile court “reasonable opportunity to address .
Jaime Q. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Jaime Q. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., -80 ¶ 16 (App. 2014) (“[A] parent’s failure to assert legitimate complaints in the juvenile court about the adequacy of services needlessly injects uncertainty and potential delay into the proceedings, when important rights and interests are at stake and timeliness is critical.”).
Amber H. v. Dcs, E Al. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Amber H. v. Dcs, E Al. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., -79, ¶¶ 16, 18 (App. 2014) (holding the mother’s failure to raise an issue until appeal “waived [her] right to argue for the first time on appeal that ADES failed to offer appropriate reunification services.”).
Matthew J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Matthew J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Amber M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Amber M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Michelle H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Michelle H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Fernando M. v. Dcs, C.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Fernando M. v. Dcs, C.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶¶ 17-18 (App. 2014).
Erin B. v. Jon F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Erin B. v. Jon F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Fatuma H. v. Dcs, P.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Fatuma H. v. Dcs, P.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., -79, ¶¶ 16-17 (App. 2014) (applying waiver when parent did not raise any concerns over reunification services during the dependency or argue the issue during trial, and "wait[ed] to bring [the issue] to light for the first time on appeal").
Tyrome B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Darrin v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Darrin v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Tyrome B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Dolores R. v. Dcs, F.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Dolores R. v. Dcs, F.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jennifer S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jennifer S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 16 (App. 2014) (holding that a parent who fails to object to the adequacy of reunification services is precluded from raising the issue on appeal).
Nicholios N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Nicholios N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶¶ 17-18 (App. 2014) (applying waiver when both before the termination hearing and “at the termination hearing, [the mother] did not argue that [DCS] failed to make reasonable efforts”).
Shirley R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Shirley R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., -79, ¶¶ 16, 18 (App. 2014).
Mary Jean M. v. Dcs, E.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Mary Jean M. v. Dcs, E.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Johanna M. v. Dcs, Y.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Johanna M. v. Dcs, Y.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by