Cited by

We review orders adjudicating children dependent for an abuse of discretion, “deferring to the [superior] court’s ability to weigh and analyze the evidence.” Shella H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 13 (App. 2016).

Mother is correct that the juvenile court must make its dependency determination “based upon the circumstances existing at the time of the adjudication hearing.” Shella H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 12 (App. 2016).

We review the superior court’s dismissal of a dependency action for an abuse of discretion, Shella H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 13 (App. 2016), and we accept the court’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous, Michael M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.

Dependency Action No. 96290, (explaining in a dependency action that parents’ present denial of responsibility for past abuse and neglect supports a finding they are not “presently willing to or capable of exercising proper and effective parental care and control”); see Shella H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶¶ 16–17 (App. 2016) (holding in dependency that “domestic violence need not be continuous or actively occurring” if it remains substantiated and unresolved, “particularly” where the parent den

Shella H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 12 (App. 2016).

This Court reviews the superior court’s dependency order for an abuse of discretion, Shella H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 13 (App. 2016), and accepts its findings of fact unless clearly erroneous, Michael M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.

Shella H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 13 (App. 2016).

DISCUSSION ¶10 We review the superior court’s dependency order for an abuse of discretion, Shella H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 13 (App. 2016), and accept its findings of fact unless clearly erroneous, Michael M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.

See Shella H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 12 (App. 2016) (“[T]he court must determine whether a child is dependent based upon the circumstances existing at the time of the adjudication hearing.”); see also Willie G., 211 Ariz. at 235, ¶ 21 (recognizing the juvenile court’s broad discretion in dependency cases because the primary consideration is the ch

Shella H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 1 (App. 2016).

¶12 The juvenile court must make its dependency determination “based upon the circumstances existing at the time of the adjudication hearing.” Shella H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 12 (App. 2016).

See Shella H. v. Dep’t Child Safety, ¶ 12 (App. 2016).

See Shella H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 16 (App. 2016).

Shella H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 12 (App. 2016).

¶16 “[T]he juvenile court must consider the circumstances as they exist at the time of the dependency adjudication hearing in determining whether a child is a dependent child.” Shella H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 1 (App. 2016).

Shella H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 13 (App. 2016).

¶21 “[T]he juvenile court must consider the circumstances as they exist at the time of the dependency adjudication hearing in determining whether a child is a dependent child.” Shella H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 1 (App. 2016).

Decision of the Court ¶10 “The juvenile court must consider the circumstances as they exist at the time of the dependency adjudication hearing in determining whether a child is a dependent child.” Shella H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 1 (App. 2016).

¶20 The juvenile court determines “whether a child is dependent based upon the circumstances existing at the time of the adjudication hearing.” Shella H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 12 (App. 2016).

¶18 “The juvenile court must consider the circumstances as they exist at the time of the dependency adjudication hearing in determining whether a child is a dependent child.” Shella H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 1 (App. 2016).

Decision of the Court J-77188, see also Shella H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 14 (App. 2016) (“A child may be dependent when the parent is unwilling or unable to protect the child from abuse.”).

The court must make its dependency finding “based upon the circumstances existing at the time of the adjudication hearing.” Shella H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 12 (App. 2016).

Shella H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 13 (App. 2016).

The superior court must make its dependency determination “based upon the circumstances existing at the time of the adjudication hearing.” Shella H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 12 (App. 2016).

§ 8- 844(C)(1); ¶ 13 (App. 2016).