Cited by

See Aleise H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 10 (holding that the court’s findings support the best interests independently and are supported by trial evidence and therefore the mother showed no error).

Aleise H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 9 (App. 2018).

See Aleise H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 10 (App. 2018).

“Because the superior court ‘is in the best position to weigh the evidence, observe the parties, judge the credibility of witnesses, and resolve disputed facts,’ this court will affirm an order terminating parental rights so long as it is supported by reasonable evidence.” Aleise H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 7 (App. 2018) (citation omitted).

“Because the superior court ‘is in the best position to weigh the evidence, observe the parties, judge the credibility of witnesses, and resolve disputed facts,’ this court will affirm an order terminating parental rights so long as it is supported by reasonable evidence.” Aleise H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 7 (App. 2018) (citation omitted).

See, e.g., Aleise H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 10 (App. 2018); Demetrius L., 239 Ariz. at 4, ¶ 16.

See, e.g., Aleise H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 10 (App. 2018).

See Aleise H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶¶ 12–13 (App. 2018) (concluding that Mother waived her claim that the superior court did not make adequate best-interests findings because she failed to raise it below).

Aleise H. v. Dep’t Child Safety, ¶ 12 (App. 2018).

See Aleise H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 10 (App. 2018).

at 536, ¶ 10; see also, e.g., Aleise H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, –73, ¶¶ 11–13 (App. 2018) (applying waiver doctrine to a claim that the juvenile court’s findings were inadequate); Antonio M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.

See Aleise H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, –72 ¶¶ 6, 10 (App. 2018).

See Aleise H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, –72 ¶¶ 6, 10 (App. 2018).

See Aleise H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, –72 ¶¶ 6, 10 (App. 2018).

See Aleise H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, -73 ¶¶ 11-13 (App. 2018).

See Aleise H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 10 (App. 2018) (A best-interests determination could be “independently” supported by either the benefit the children would receive if they were “placed with a familial, potentially adoptive placement” or the detriment they would experience from “remain[ing] in care for an indefinite period.”).

See, e.g., Aliese H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 10 (App. 2018) (holding a best-interests determination “independently” supported by either the benefit the children would receive if they were “placed with a familial, potentially adoptive placement” or the detriment they would experience from “remain[ing] in care for an indefinite period”); Mary Lou C. v. Ari

Aleise H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 12 (App. 2018) (alteration in original; internal quotation marks omitted).

¶13 Citing Aleise H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, DCS contends Mother waived her ability to challenge the court’s findings on appeal because she failed to object to the proposed findings before the juvenile court signed them.

Aleise H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 9 (App. 2018) (internal citation omitted).

See Aleise v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 13 (App. 2018) (citing cases).

§§ 8– 533(B), –537(B); Aleise H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 7 (App. 2018).

Aleise H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 9 (App. 2018) (internal citation omitted).

Aleise H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 9 (App. 2018) (internal citation omitted).