Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior Court, 836 P.2d 445.

106 citing documents.

State v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Romley v. Superior Court (Roper), (noting that “exclu[sion]” of “essential evidence” that “preclud[es] a defendant from presenting a theory of defense” violates “the defendant’s right to due process”); Castro, 163 Ariz. at 470 (noting that a court endeavoring to “reduce the trauma and humiliation of the criminal process for the victim
State v. Ahrens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Ahrens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Lane Draper v. Hon. gentry/state/nez 532 P.3d 1153 Ariz. 2023
Lane Draper v. Hon. gentry/state/nez 532 P.3d 1153 Ariz. 2023
Romley v. Superior Court (Roper)
R.S./s.E. v. Hon. thompson/teddy Vanders 485 P.3d 1068 Ariz. 2021
R.S./s.E. v. Hon. thompson/teddy Vanders 485 P.3d 1068 Ariz. 2021
State v. Hon. cooper/chambers III Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Hon. cooper/chambers III Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Romley v. Superior Court (Roper)
rs/se v. Hon. thompson/vanders Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
rs/se v. Hon. thompson/vanders Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Romley v. Superior Court (Roper), the superior court found that Vanders’s due process rights required disclosure of M.S.’s privileged records for an in camera review.
State v. Kellywood 433 P.3d 1205 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Kellywood 433 P.3d 1205 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
Romley v. Superior Court (Roper) , , 237, (§ 2.1(A)(5) encompasses medical records).
State v. Matthews 428 P.3d 198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Matthews 428 P.3d 198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Romley v. Superior Court (Roper) , , 240-41, , 453-54 (App. 1992).
In Re Reynaldo P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
In Re Reynaldo P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Romley, the court improperly "elevated victim's rights above any due process right[s]" by limiting his ability "to gain access to any backup documentation in possession of the victim."
Z.W. v. Foster 422 P.3d 582 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Z.W. v. Foster 422 P.3d 582 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Romley v. Superior Court ( Roper ), , 236, , 449 (App. 1992) (noting that "when the defendant's constitutional right to due process conflicts with the Victim's Bill of Rights in a direct manner ...
State v. Boozer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Boozer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Romley v. Superior Court (Roper)
State v. Scott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Scott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Romley v. Superior Court (Roper)
State v. Peterson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Peterson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Bravo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Bravo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Romley v. Superior Court (Roper), -40, -53 (App. 1992) (holding that if medical records are found to be exculpatory and essential to present defense case or impeach the victim, due process requires their production).
State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles Holle 358 P.3d 639 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles Holle 358 P.3d 639 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
(“With regard to the justification defense, self-defense is a statutory affirmative defense in Arizona.”).
State v. Hon. stephens/wilson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Hon. stephens/wilson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Romley v. Superior Court (Roper), P.2d 445 (App. 1992), P.3d 596 (App. 2007)—that “some limited infringement on the victim’s rights may be required” upon consideration of the defendant’s due process right of access to evidence favorable to the defense and material to either guilt or punishment.
State of Arizona v. Marshall Neal Ray 355 P.3d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Marshall Neal Ray 355 P.3d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
-39, -52 (App. 1992), we permitted the discovery of the victim’s mental health records upon a showing that they were relevant to a claim of self- defense.
State v. Hon. padilla/ray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Hon. padilla/ray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Romley v. Superior Court (Roper), P.2d 445 (App. 1992), the court concluded that M.C.’s privacy interest in keeping his Rule 11 documents confidential was secondary to Ray’s right to cross-examine and impeach him at trial.
State v. Dyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Dyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
3 Dyer argues our decision in State v. Superior Court (Roper), P.2d 445 (App. 1992) is directly on point and required disclosure of the documents.
State Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Hon. chavez/robert Lee Gill 321 P.3d 420 Ariz. 2014
State Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Hon. chavez/robert Lee Gill 321 P.3d 420 Ariz. 2014
Romley v. Superior Court In & For County of Maricopa (Roper), (applying phrase “other discovery request” to request for victim’s medical records).
Gary Abeyta v. Sierra Tucson, Inc. and Heidi Sonntag 319 P.3d 996 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Gary Abeyta v. Sierra Tucson, Inc. and Heidi Sonntag 319 P.3d 996 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State v. Welty 308 P.3d 1159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Welty 308 P.3d 1159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Joseph M. Arpaio v. Jennifer Braillard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Joseph M. Arpaio v. Jennifer Braillard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
State of Arizona v. Douglas Lee Eddington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State of Arizona v. Douglas Lee Eddington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
(identifying law enforcement officers as “agent[s] of the state”).
Morehart v. Barton 236 P.3d 1216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Morehart v. Barton 236 P.3d 1216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Romley v. Superior Court (Roper), , (holding that when a defendant’s constitutional right to due process conflicts with the Victims’ Bill of Rights in a direct manner, the defendant’s due process rights are superior).