Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Scottsdale Princess Partnership v. Maricopa County, 916 P.2d 1084.

29 citing documents.

SHUMATE v. DAVIS/BROADBENT Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Qasimyar v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Qasimyar v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See Scottsdale Princess P’ship v. Maricopa 5 QASIMYAR, (properties classified “according to specific character and use”); Krausz ex rel.
General Motors Corp. v. Maricopa County 350 P.3d 841 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
General Motors Corp. v. Maricopa County 350 P.3d 841 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See RCJ Corp. v. Ariz. Dep’t. of Revenue, , Scottsdale Princess P’ , (distinguishing between refund action and challenges to classification or valuation).
Sonoran Peaks, LLC v. Maricopa County 340 P.3d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sonoran Peaks, LLC v. Maricopa County 340 P.3d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
VERMA v. Stuhr 221 P.3d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
VERMA v. Stuhr 221 P.3d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF ECON. SEC. v. Lee 175 P.3d 85 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF ECON. SEC. v. Lee 175 P.3d 85 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Absent exceptional circumstances not present here, [5] this court will not consider arguments not first presented to the trial court
Rand v. Porsche Financial Services 167 P.3d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Rand v. Porsche Financial Services 167 P.3d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
See Scottsdale Princess P’ , (appellate court will not consider on appeal arguments not first presented to the trial court).
Wilmot v. Wilmot 58 P.3d 507 Ariz. 2002
Wilmot v. Wilmot 58 P.3d 507 Ariz. 2002
¶ 10 We are not bound “by the trial court's conclusions of law nor by findings that combine both fact and law.”
Enterprise Leasing Co. of Phoenix v. Ehmke 3 P.3d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Enterprise Leasing Co. of Phoenix v. Ehmke 3 P.3d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
City of Tucson v. State 957 P.2d 341 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
City of Tucson v. State 957 P.2d 341 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Cutter Aviation, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 958 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Scottsdale Princess Partnership v. Department of Revenue 958 P.2d 15 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Cutter Aviation, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 958 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
371 n. 2, , 1087 n. 2 (Ariz.App.1995).
Scottsdale Princess Partnership v. Department of Revenue 958 P.2d 15 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
371 n. 2, , 1087 n. 2 (App.1995) (opinion on appeal from other rulings in same case).
Pimalco, Inc. v. Maricopa County 937 P.2d 1198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Pimalco, Inc. v. Maricopa County 937 P.2d 1198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
(appeal resolving other rulings in same case).
Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Apache County 912 P.2d 9 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Apache County 912 P.2d 9 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Bull HN Information Systems v. State Department of Revenue 916 P.2d 1109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Bull HN Information Systems v. State Department of Revenue 916 P.2d 1109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995