Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Harris, 238 P.2d 957.

61 citing documents.

Brown v. Dembow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Brown v. Dembow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
The Arizona common-law rule was “that convictions for misdemeanors were not admissible for impeachment.” Malloy, 131 Ariz. at 127 (-03 (1961)); (“on cross- examination specific acts of misconduct cannot be shown unless the witness has been convicted of” a “felonious crime”) (citing cases).
State v. Orantez 902 P.2d 824 Ariz. 1995
State v. Orantez 902 P.2d 824 Ariz. 1995
State v. Farmer 617 P.2d 521 Ariz. 1980
State v. Farmer 617 P.2d 521 Ariz. 1980
State v. Lewis 589 P.2d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Followed State v. Lewis 589 P.2d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Lozano 588 P.2d 841 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Lozano 588 P.2d 841 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Segovia v. Industrial Commission 580 P.2d 369 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Segovia v. Industrial Commission 580 P.2d 369 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State Ex Rel. Pope v. Superior Court 545 P.2d 946 Ariz. 1976
State Ex Rel. Pope v. Superior Court 545 P.2d 946 Ariz. 1976
Udall, Arizona Law of Evidence § 66 (1960).
State v. King 514 P.2d 1032 Ariz. 1973
State v. King 514 P.2d 1032 Ariz. 1973
State v. Reynolds 503 P.2d 369 Ariz. 1972
State v. Reynolds 503 P.2d 369 Ariz. 1972
State v. Johnson 479 P.2d 424 Ariz. 1971
State v. Johnson 479 P.2d 424 Ariz. 1971
at 142 , at 959: “The reason given by the courts for this limitation is that this is a collateral matter and if allowed it would be time-consuming and a confusion of the issues.
State v. Price 477 P.2d 523 Ariz. 1970
State v. Price 477 P.2d 523 Ariz. 1970
278 P.2d *435 432; , ; , ; , .
State v. Reeden 477 P.2d 240 Ariz. 1970
State v. Reeden 477 P.2d 240 Ariz. 1970
“In Arizona, a witness may be impeached by the showing of a prior felony conviction, , ; , , except where the prior felony conviction is so remote that it cannot reasonably cast a reflection on the witness’s credibility, , .
State v. Albe 460 P.2d 651 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
State v. Albe 460 P.2d 651 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
State v. Taylor 451 P.2d 648 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State v. Taylor 451 P.2d 648 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State v. Goldsmith 450 P.2d 684 Ariz. 1969
State v. Goldsmith 450 P.2d 684 Ariz. 1969
209 , 19 A.2d 288 ; People v. Buyle, 22 Cal.App.2d 143 , ; Warren v. Hynes, *229 4 Wash.2d 128 , .” , .
State v. Wayman 449 P.2d 296 Ariz. 1969
State v. Wayman 449 P.2d 296 Ariz. 1969
Fiske v. Soland 448 P.2d 429 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Fiske v. Soland 448 P.2d 429 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State v. Owen 416 P.2d 589 Ariz. 1966
State v. Owen 416 P.2d 589 Ariz. 1966
It is defendants’ , , only convictions for felonies prior to the date the testimony is given may be introduced to impeach the credibility of a witness.
State v. Willits 409 P.2d 727 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. Willits 409 P.2d 727 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
: “ * * * this court has allied Arizona with the minority of states by holding that on cross-examination specific acts of misconduct cannot be shown unless the witness has been convicted of that crime.” 1 In Arizona, neither suicide nor a threat to commit suicide is a crime rendering evi
State v. Reyes 408 P.2d 400 Ariz. 1965
State v. Reyes 408 P.2d 400 Ariz. 1965
State v. Gallegos 407 P.2d 752 Ariz. 1965
State v. Gallegos 407 P.2d 752 Ariz. 1965
State v. Sowards 406 P.2d 202 Ariz. 1965
State v. Sowards 406 P.2d 202 Ariz. 1965
State v. Mangrum 403 P.2d 925 Ariz. 1965
State v. Mangrum 403 P.2d 925 Ariz. 1965
we said: “In the majority of jurisdictions only veracity character is admissible to impeach a witness and evidence of bad general character not affecting veracity is inadmissible.
State v. Barker 385 P.2d 516 Ariz. 1963
State v. Barker 385 P.2d 516 Ariz. 1963
Tn Arizona, a witness may be impeached by the showing of a prior felony conviction, , ; , , except where the prior felony conviction is so remote that it cannot reasonably cast a reflection on the witness’s credibility, , .
State v. Johnson 383 P.2d 862 Ariz. 1963
State v. Johnson 383 P.2d 862 Ariz. 1963