Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Drury v. Burr, 483 P.2d 539.

25 citing documents.

State v. Knox Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State of Arizona v. Anthony Eugene Searight Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2026
State of Arizona v. Anthony Eugene Searight Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2026
-86 (1979) (removal of victim’s life support systems not superseding cause of death when injuries resulting from defendant’s conduct “cause death indirectly through a chain of natural effects and causes unchanged by human action” ()).
Hill v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Hill v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
The inquiry is whether “the proof is sufficient to cause a person of ordinary caution or prudence conscientiously to entertain a reasonable suspicion that a public offense has been committed in which the accused participated.”
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II 359 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II 359 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
In Drury v. Burr, the court announced that “[w]here there is more than one inference equally reasonable[,] then probable cause does not exist, but where one inference is more reasonable than another and is on the side of guilt, then probable cause may be said to exist.”
Steven Lane Fuller v. State of Arizona 314 P.3d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Steven Lane Fuller v. State of Arizona 314 P.3d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State v. Superior Court 922 P.2d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Superior Court 922 P.2d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
(defendant caused victim’s death where victim suffered fatal heart attack during robbery); , (defendant’s acts of shooting the victim found to be cause of victim’s death where victim was subsequently placed on life support system for three days before system was turned off); , (defendant’s act of breaking victim’s jaw caused victim’s death even though victim ultimately died from choking on his vomit).
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-84984 674 P.2d 836 Ariz. 1983
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-84984 674 P.2d 836 Ariz. 1983
we said that: Where there is more than one inference equally reasonable then probable cause does not exist, but where one inference is more reasonable than another ...
State Ex Rel. Collins v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. 647 P.2d 177 Ariz. 1982
State Ex Rel. Collins v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. 647 P.2d 177 Ariz. 1982
-404 , State v. Frye, 245 N.W.2d 878, 880-81 (N.D.1976); Hamer v. United States, 259 F.2d 274, 282-83 (9th Cir. 1958), cert.
State v. Hall 633 P.2d 398 Ariz. 1981
State v. Hall 633 P.2d 398 Ariz. 1981
State v. Fierro 603 P.2d 74 Ariz. 1979
State v. Fierro 603 P.2d 74 Ariz. 1979
State v. Ulin 548 P.2d 19 Ariz. 1976
State v. Ulin 548 P.2d 19 Ariz. 1976
State v. Drury 520 P.2d 495 Ariz. 1974
State v. Drury 520 P.2d 495 Ariz. 1974
State v. Forgan 505 P.2d 562 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Forgan 505 P.2d 562 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973