Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Nace v. Nace, 489 P.2d 48.
- Fogerson v. Cobb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Fogerson v. Cobb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Watson v. Watson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Watson v. Watson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Felder v. Felder Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Felder v. Felder Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Bentley v. Bentley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Bentley v. Bentley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Solberg v. Solberg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Solberg v. Solberg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Bonafede v. Giannangelo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Bonafede v. Giannangelo
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
lies with the sound discretion of the trial court.”
- Van Dyke v. Steinle 902 P.2d 1372 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- Van Dyke v. Steinle 902 P.2d 1372 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- Schroeder v. Schroeder 778 P.2d 1212 Ariz. 1989
-
Schroeder v. Schroeder
778 P.2d 1212
Ariz. 1989
Kamrath v. Kamrath, 17 Ariz.App.
- Chaney v. Chaney 699 P.2d 398 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- Chaney v. Chaney 699 P.2d 398 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- Marquez v. Marquez 647 P.2d 1191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
- Marquez v. Marquez 647 P.2d 1191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
- Mori v. Mori 603 P.2d 85 Ariz. 1979
- Mori v. Mori 603 P.2d 85 Ariz. 1979
- States v. States 603 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1979
- Scott v. Scott 591 P.2d 980 Ariz. 1979
- Scott v. Scott 591 P.2d 980 Ariz. 1979
- Hornbaker v. Hornbaker 545 P.2d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- Hornbaker v. Hornbaker 545 P.2d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- Pettibone v. Pettibone 529 P.2d 724 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
-
Pettibone v. Pettibone
529 P.2d 724
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
It is true that if “alimony is not necessary for a wife’s support and maintenance, then the husband should not be required to pay it.”
- Linton v. Linton 499 P.2d 174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
-
Linton v. Linton
499 P.2d 174
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Does the evidence support the court’s findings that the wife’s necessity for alimony has ceased and that her expenses have decreased; and, has there been a sufficient change in circumstances regarding these matters to justify the modification of the alimony provisions of the divorce decree ?” Many of the rules of law relating to the modification of a , and include the following : That a trial court awarding alimony retains jurisdiction to modify the alimony award at any later time “as may be jus
- Kamrath v. Kamrath 498 P.2d 468 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
- Kamrath v. Kamrath 498 P.2d 468 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972