Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Parsons v. Bekins Freight, 493 P.2d 913.

114 citing documents.

Meiners v. University of Arizona , State of Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Meiners v. University of Arizona , State of Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Parra v. Pedus, Transcontinental Insurance Company 141 P.3d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Parra v. Pedus, Transcontinental Insurance Company 141 P.3d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
The Commission in such cases has nothing to affirm.”), P.2d 913 (1972); see also Santiago v. Indus.
Stapert v. Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners 108 P.3d 956 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Stapert v. Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners 108 P.3d 956 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
In re Trull v. Industrial Comm'n, 21 Ariz.App.
Iphaar v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 831 P.2d 422 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Iphaar v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 831 P.2d 422 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Epstein v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 741 P.2d 322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Epstein v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 741 P.2d 322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
A judicially created exception was first recognized by the Arizona Supreme Court *193 , (the Industrial Commission could excuse an untimely hearing request if there was a meritorious excuse, the delay was not excessive, and the effect was nonprejudicial to the carrier).
Allen v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 733 P.2d 290 Ariz. 1987
Allen v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 733 P.2d 290 Ariz. 1987
Allen v. Industrial Commission 733 P.2d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Allen v. Industrial Commission 733 P.2d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Wilson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 709 P.2d 895 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Wilson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 709 P.2d 895 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
P.2d 1313 (App. 1983) (dictum) A.R.S.
Frazier v. Industrial Commission 702 P.2d 717 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Frazier v. Industrial Commission 702 P.2d 717 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
1 , the failure to timely file after notice from the Industrial Commission deprived the Commission of jurisdiction to further consider the matter.
Harrelson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 697 P.2d 1119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Harrelson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 697 P.2d 1119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
United Asphalt v. Industrial Commission 685 P.2d 1361 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
United Asphalt v. Industrial Commission 685 P.2d 1361 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Cook v. Industrial Commission, supra; Kleins-mith v. Industrial Commission, supra.
Magma Copper Co. v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONA 676 P.2d 1096 Ariz. 1983
Magma Copper Co. v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONA 676 P.2d 1096 Ariz. 1983
Stange Company v. Industrial Commission, 120 Ariz. at 243 , 585 P.2d at 264
Holler v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ. 680 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Holler v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ. 680 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
(permitting the Industrial Commission to excuse an untimely hearing request if there was a meritorious excuse, the delay was not excessive, and the effect was nonprejudicial to the carrier).
Nelson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 656 P.2d 1230 Ariz. 1982
Nelson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 656 P.2d 1230 Ariz. 1982
The discretion of the Commission to waive a
Rosovich v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 651 P.2d 1199 Ariz. 1982
Rosovich v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 651 P.2d 1199 Ariz. 1982
Cook v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 651 P.2d 365 Ariz. 1982
Cook v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 651 P.2d 365 Ariz. 1982
Roman v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 637 P.2d 1084 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Roman v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 637 P.2d 1084 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
the court extended the Jones rationale to the situation where the claimant failed to make a timely request for a hearing before the Commission after an adverse notice by the insurance carrier.
Town of El Mirage v. Industrial Commission 621 P.2d 286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Town of El Mirage v. Industrial Commission 621 P.2d 286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Judd v. Industrial Commission, 23 Ariz.App.
Keeler v. Industrial Commission 609 P.2d 603 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Keeler v. Industrial Commission 609 P.2d 603 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Additionally, , and subsequent cases to the question of the waiver of the untimely filing.
Hurst v. Bisbee Unified School District No. Two 607 P.2d 391 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Hurst v. Bisbee Unified School District No. Two 607 P.2d 391 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
See, , In re Trull, 21 Ariz.App.
American Fence Co. v. Industrial Commission 597 P.2d 198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
American Fence Co. v. Industrial Commission 597 P.2d 198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Keeler v. Industrial Commission 592 P.2d 1282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Keeler v. Industrial Commission 592 P.2d 1282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Citizen's Savings & Loan v. Industrial Commission 586 P.2d 985 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Citizen's Savings & Loan v. Industrial Commission 586 P.2d 985 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
In this regard, Citizen’s relies upon Janis v. Industrial Comm’n, , , and Gurovich v. Industrial Comm’n, 23 Ariz.App.
Stange Co. v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZ. 585 P.2d 261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Stange Co. v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZ. 585 P.2d 261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
our courts have held that the failure to file a request for hearing within 60 days of the action being protested does not operate to deprive the Industrial Commission of jurisdiction to decide the merits of the protest, provided the claimant appears to have a meritorious position, the facts do n
Phoenix Cotton Pickery v. Industrial Commission 584 P.2d 601 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Phoenix Cotton Pickery v. Industrial Commission 584 P.2d 601 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Nor is there a claim for relief from the effects of a , and Kleinsmith v. Industrial Comm’n, 26 Ariz.App.