Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Polan, 278 P.2d 432.

67 citing documents.

Villalpando v. Reagan 121 P.3d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Villalpando v. Reagan 121 P.3d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
(A prosecutor acts in a semi-judicial *313 capacity and is required to follow principle alone, without bias or prejudice.).
State v. Sustaita 583 P.2d 239 Ariz. 1978
State v. Sustaita 583 P.2d 239 Ariz. 1978
P. 458 (1923); , 208 P. 412 (1922).
State v. Killian 577 P.2d 259 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Killian 577 P.2d 259 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Nettz 560 P.2d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Nettz 560 P.2d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
The courts of this state recognize that “The Arizona Constitution has guaranteed to everyone a fair trial, and this type of trial cannot be had if highly prejudicial matter is used to secure a conviction.”
State v. White 494 P.2d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
State v. White 494 P.2d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Objection was made that the demonstration was not performed under “substantially the same conditions” as existed during the original act, , because of the uncontradicted testimony that the radio always played and the shower was always running.
State v. Johnson 479 P.2d 424 Ariz. 1971
State v. Johnson 479 P.2d 424 Ariz. 1971
(“It has long been settled in this state that a witness cannot be impeached by showing specific acts of misconduct not amounting to a felony conviction.”); , ; , ; , .
State v. Burkheart 478 P.2d 515 Ariz. 1970
State v. Burkheart 478 P.2d 515 Ariz. 1970
198 P. 288 , for the proposition that in-court experiments are permissible.
State v. Van Winkle 478 P.2d 105 Ariz. 1970
State v. Van Winkle 478 P.2d 105 Ariz. 1970
State v. Price 477 P.2d 523 Ariz. 1970
State v. Price 477 P.2d 523 Ariz. 1970
278 P.2d *435 432; , ; , ; , .
State v. Brady 461 P.2d 488 Ariz. 1969
State v. Brady 461 P.2d 488 Ariz. 1969
State v. Walls 456 P.2d 409 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State v. Walls 456 P.2d 409 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State ex rel. Corbin v. Superior Court 451 P.2d 600 Ariz. 1969
State ex rel. Corbin v. Superior Court 451 P.2d 600 Ariz. 1969
State v. Bowen 449 P.2d 603 Ariz. 1969
State v. Bowen 449 P.2d 603 Ariz. 1969
: “ * * * When a defendant has convictions for felonies in his background and takes the stand, he does so at the risk of having his prior record of such convictions laid before the jury.
State v. Foggy 420 P.2d 934 Ariz. 1966
State v. Foggy 420 P.2d 934 Ariz. 1966
State v. Robison 408 P.2d 29 Ariz. 1965
State v. Robison 408 P.2d 29 Ariz. 1965
State v. Gallegos 407 P.2d 752 Ariz. 1965
State v. Gallegos 407 P.2d 752 Ariz. 1965
State v. Sowards 406 P.2d 202 Ariz. 1965
State v. Sowards 406 P.2d 202 Ariz. 1965
State v. Goodyear 404 P.2d 397 Ariz. 1965
State v. Goodyear 404 P.2d 397 Ariz. 1965
212 P. 458 (1923) ; *318 , 208 P. 412 (1922).
State v. Armenta 402 P.2d 571 Ariz. 1965
State v. Armenta 402 P.2d 571 Ariz. 1965
Udall, Arizona Law of Evidence, § 67 pp. 105-106.
State v. Brown 400 P.2d 111 Ariz. 1965
State v. Brown 400 P.2d 111 Ariz. 1965
The test of whether the error was prejudicial enough to require reversal is whether if the error had not been committed, it is probable that the verdict might have been different, , .
State v. Ybarra 398 P.2d 905 Ariz. 1965
State v. Ybarra 398 P.2d 905 Ariz. 1965
State v. Boodry 394 P.2d 196 Ariz. 1964
State v. Boodry 394 P.2d 196 Ariz. 1964
State v. Corrales 391 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1964
State v. Corrales 391 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1964
212 P. 458 (1923) ; , 208 P. 412 (1922).
State v. Eddington 386 P.2d 20 Ariz. 1963
State v. Eddington 386 P.2d 20 Ariz. 1963
well settled in this jurisdiction that when a defendant offers himself as a witness he may be examined on whether he has suffered a previous conviction of a felony, , ; Hadley v. State, 25 Ariz 23, 212 P. 458 , it is also equally well settled that a prosecuting officer, in or *15 der to impeach him as a witness, cannot engage in questioning which casts insinuations without being prepared and able to prove the insinuations
State v. Johnson 383 P.2d 862 Ariz. 1963
State v. Johnson 383 P.2d 862 Ariz. 1963