Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Polan, 278 P.2d 432.

67 citing documents.

State v. Harvill 362 P.2d 663 Ariz. 1961
State v. Harvill 362 P.2d 663 Ariz. 1961
State v. Hilliard 359 P.2d 66 Ariz. 1961
State v. Hilliard 359 P.2d 66 Ariz. 1961
If the answer is in the affirmative he may be asked the number of such convictions, the names and nature of the crimes, and the places where they were committed, , , and if the answers are correctly given the inquiry must end there.
State v. Hudson 358 P.2d 332 Ariz. 1960
State v. Hudson 358 P.2d 332 Ariz. 1960
State v. Holman 356 P.2d 27 Ariz. 1960
State v. Holman 356 P.2d 27 Ariz. 1960
212 P. 458 ; , 208 P. 412 .
State v. Finley 338 P.2d 790 Ariz. 1959
State v. Sorrell 333 P.2d 1081 Ariz. 1959
State v. Sorrell 333 P.2d 1081 Ariz. 1959
If the answer is in the affirmative he may be asked the number of such convictions, the names and nature of the crimes, and the places where they were committed, , , and if the answers are correctly given the inquiry must end there.
State v. Stago 312 P.2d 160 Ariz. 1957
State v. Stago 312 P.2d 160 Ariz. 1957
While it is well settled in this jurisdiction that when a defendant offers himself as a witness he may be examined on whether he has suffered a previous conviction of a felony, , ; , 212 P. 458 , it is also equally well settled that a prosecuting officer, in order to impeach him as a witness, cannot engage in questioning which casts insinuations without being prepared and able to prove the insinuations
State v. Polan 293 P.2d 931 Ariz. 1956
State v. Polan 293 P.2d 931 Ariz. 1956
The facts are set forth in our prior decision of State v. Polan, reported in , , and need not be restated here.
State v. Thomas 290 P.2d 470 Ariz. 1955
State v. Thomas 290 P.2d 470 Ariz. 1955
The question concerned a matter in no' way related to the guilt or innocence of the defendant on either counts one or three and should not have been permitted, , , to the effect that if the verdict would probably have been the same had the error not been committed, such error will not require a reversal of the judgment.