Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Ronquillo v. Industrial Commission, 490 P.2d 423.
- Jimenez v. Fry's Food Stores Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Jimenez v. Fry's Food Stores Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Steiner v. affinity/copperpoint Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Steiner v. affinity/copperpoint Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Bowen v. hyatt/gallagher Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Bowen v. hyatt/gallagher Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Young v. Industrial Commission 63 P.3d 298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
-
Young v. Industrial Commission
63 P.3d 298
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Com’n., -44 , -25 (1971).
- Cornelson v. Industrial Commission 17 P.3d 114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
-
Cornelson v. Industrial Commission
17 P.3d 114
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Comm’n, -44 , -25 (1971).
- Special Fund Division v. Arizona Department of Transportation 8 P.3d 412 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
-
Special Fund Division v. Arizona Department of Transportation
8 P.3d 412
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
(ALJ should find the “complete effect” of the injuries); Ronquillo v. Industrial Comm’n, , (ALJ should determine the “entire disability as it exists after the second injury, removing them from the schedule”).
- Gladys v. Industrial Commission 968 P.2d 597 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
- Gladys v. Industrial Commission 968 P.2d 597 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
- PFS v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 955 P.2d 30 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
-
PFS v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
955 P.2d 30
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Stat. Ann. (“A.R.S.”) § 23-1044(E) (1995); Ronquillo v. Industrial Comm’n, -44 , -25 (1971).
- Special Fund Division/No Insurance Section v. Industrial Commission 891 P.2d 854 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
-
Special Fund Division/No Insurance Section v. Industrial Commission
891 P.2d 854
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Ronquillo v. Industrial Comm’n
- Valle v. Farmers Investment Co. 857 P.2d 1295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
-
Valle v. Farmers Investment Co.
857 P.2d 1295
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
That injury was closed in 1989 , 1 with a finding of no loss of earning capacity.
- Conner Manufacturing, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 836 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
-
Conner Manufacturing, Inc. v. Industrial Commission
836 P.2d 464
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
See, e.g., Pullins v. Industrial Comm’n, , (conclusive presumption of disability based on severity of preexisting impairment); Ronquillo v. Industrial Comm’n, , (irrebuttable presumption of disability if preexisting impairment work-related and within schedule; rebuttable presumption if preexisting impairment not work-related but would have been scheduled if it had been work-related).
- Wyckoff v. Industrial Commission 819 P.2d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
-
Wyckoff v. Industrial Commission
819 P.2d 1016
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
See Ronquillo v. Industrial Comm’n
- Adams Insulation Co. v. Industrial Commission 789 P.2d 1056 Ariz. 1990
-
Adams Insulation Co. v. Industrial Commission
789 P.2d 1056
Ariz. 1990
If the prior non-industrial disability would have supported a scheduled award “had it been industrially related, there is a presumption that the prior injury had an effect on the earning capacity of the workman at the time of the second injury although this presumption can be overcome.” Ronquillo v. Industrial Comm’n
- Pollard v. Industrial Commission 767 P.2d 22 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
-
Pollard v. Industrial Commission
767 P.2d 22
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
The sole issue in this special action review of an Industrial Commission award is whether a carrier or the Special Fund may re-litigate whether an earlier injury was scheduled, in order to avoid the unschedul-ing of a subsequent scheduled injury under the rationale of Ronquillo v. Industrial Comm’n, , when neither was a party to the earlier determination.
- Dye v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 736 P.2d 376 Ariz. 1987
- Dye v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 736 P.2d 376 Ariz. 1987
- Marriott Corp. v. Industrial Commission 750 P.2d 17 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- Marriott Corp. v. Industrial Commission 750 P.2d 17 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- Tyrrell v. Industrial Commission 707 P.2d 967 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- Tyrrell v. Industrial Commission 707 P.2d 967 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission 697 P.2d 1089 Ariz. 1985
- Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission 697 P.2d 1089 Ariz. 1985
- Crowley Construction Co. v. Industrial Commission 694 P.2d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
-
Crowley Construction Co. v. Industrial Commission
694 P.2d 1248
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
While the wrist injury was scheduled in nature, because it constituted a successive scheduled injury, , and the claimant was awarded unscheduled permanent partial disability benefits in the sum of $305.45 per month representing his combined loss of earning capacity based upon both the knee injury and the wrist injury.
- Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission 697 P.2d 1100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
-
Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission
697 P.2d 1100
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
to the effect that "where there is a prior scheduled industrially related injury, the Commission may not ignore the previous injury when the workman suffers a second industrial injury,” at 544, ; however, there is no indication that that case involved parties in the second action who
- Cementation Co. of America, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 680 P.2d 186 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- Cementation Co. of America, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 680 P.2d 186 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- Pullins v. Industrial Commission 645 P.2d 807 Ariz. 1982
-
Pullins v. Industrial Commission
645 P.2d 807
Ariz. 1982
* * * In the case of a prior non-industrially related injury which would have been a scheduled award had it been industrially related, there is a presumption that the prior injury had an effect on the earning capacity of the workman at the time of the second injury although this presumption can be overcome * * *.”
- Kovacs v. Industrial Commission 644 P.2d 909 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
-
Kovacs v. Industrial Commission
644 P.2d 909
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Alsbrooks v. Industrial Commission, supra; Yanez v. Industrial Commission, 21 Ariz.App.
- Asbestos Engineering & Supply Co. v. Industrial Commission 642 P.2d 903 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
-
Asbestos Engineering & Supply Co. v. Industrial Commission
642 P.2d 903
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Borsh v. *561 Industrial Commission
- Reddel v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 640 P.2d 194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
- Reddel v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 640 P.2d 194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981