Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Micucci v. Industrial Commission, 494 P.2d 1324.

148 citing documents.

Danial v. Indus. Comm'n of Ariz. 434 P.3d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Danial v. Indus. Comm'n of Ariz. 434 P.3d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Poulter v. Game & Fish/ State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Poulter v. Game & Fish/ State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
McGee v. ihop/northern Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
McGee v. ihop/northern Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Julie Munoz v. Sonic Restaurants 10 and Hartford Accident & indemnity/gallagher Bassett 318 P.3d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Julie Munoz v. Sonic Restaurants 10 and Hartford Accident & indemnity/gallagher Bassett 318 P.3d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Schuck & Sons Construction v. Industrial Commission 138 P.3d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Schuck & Sons Construction v. Industrial Commission 138 P.3d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Fry's Food Stores v. Industrial Commission 776 P.2d 797 Ariz. 1989
Fry's Food Stores v. Industrial Commission 776 P.2d 797 Ariz. 1989
Anton v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 688 P.2d 192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Anton v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 688 P.2d 192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Bill Breck Dodge, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 675 P.2d 275 Ariz. 1983
Bill Breck Dodge, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 675 P.2d 275 Ariz. 1983
University of Arizona v. Industrial Commission 666 P.2d 465 Ariz. 1983
University of Arizona v. Industrial Commission 666 P.2d 465 Ariz. 1983
Though the rule is that the findings of an administrative law judge are binding if reasonably supported by the evidence, , the Court of Appeals reversed his determination, holding that a physical examination of the claimant was needed to provide an adequate basis for a medical opinion that would support a finding of impairment arising from the burn injury.
Scheller v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 656 P.2d 1279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Scheller v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 656 P.2d 1279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Arrowhead Press, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 653 P.2d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Arrowhead Press, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 653 P.2d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Greenway, Etc. v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz. 636 P.2d 1264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Greenway Baptist Church v. Industrial Commission 636 P.2d 1264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Greenway Baptist Church v. Industrial Commission 636 P.2d 1264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Greenway, Etc. v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz. 636 P.2d 1264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Parkway Manufacturing v. Industrial Commission 626 P.2d 612 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Parkway Manufacturing v. Industrial Commission 626 P.2d 612 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Ryan v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz. 623 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Ryan v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz. 623 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Greenlaw Jewelers v. Industrial Commission 621 P.2d 49 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Greenlaw Jewelers v. Industrial Commission 621 P.2d 49 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Nolden v. Industrial Commission 622 P.2d 60 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Nolden v. Industrial Commission 622 P.2d 60 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Home Insurance v. Industrial Commission 599 P.2d 801 Ariz. 1979
Home Insurance v. Industrial Commission 599 P.2d 801 Ariz. 1979
See, e. g., , State Compensation Fund v. Industrial Commission, 25 Ariz.App.
Wiedmaier v. Industrial Commission 589 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1978
Savage Welding Supplies v. Industrial Commission 587 P.2d 778 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Savage Welding Supplies v. Industrial Commission 587 P.2d 778 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Faith Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Industrial Commission 581 P.2d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Releford v. Industrial Commission 584 P.2d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Releford v. Industrial Commission 584 P.2d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to sustaining the award, as we must, , we are of the opinion that there was sufficient reasonable evidence to support the award and affirm.
Faith Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Industrial Commission 581 P.2d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Micucci v. Industrial Comm’n
Bergstresser v. Industrial Commission 575 P.2d 354 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Bergstresser v. Industrial Commission 575 P.2d 354 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
We note that it is well established law in Arizona that on appeal this court must view the evidence in a light most favorable to upholding an award of the Industrial Commission, , , and the petitioner has the burden of demonstrating that the Commission was in error.
Chavez v. Industrial Commission 575 P.2d 340 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Chavez v. Industrial Commission 575 P.2d 340 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Considering the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the award of the Industrial Commission ( , ) and recognizing that it is the duty of the Commission to resolve conflicts in the medical testimony (Graver Tank & , ), we find that there was more than sufficient medical evidence to support the hearing officer’s f
Jordan v. Industrial Commission 571 P.2d 712 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Jordan v. Industrial Commission 571 P.2d 712 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
United Metro v. Industrial Commission 570 P.2d 818 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977