Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Kepner v. Western Fire Insurance Company, 509 P.2d 222.

78 citing documents.

Jacob Benson v. Casa De Capri Ent Ariz. 2022
Jacob Benson v. Casa De Capri Ent Ariz. 2022
Co., (“Such a testing of the insurer’s liability may take the form of .
Truck v. Teixidor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Truck v. Teixidor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Secura v. Sudhoff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Secura v. Sudhoff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sudhoff contends Secura could have 2 for the proposition that an insurance coverage declaratory relief action “can be filed at virtually any time.” We disagree.
Dennis Teufel v. American family/kerry Hanson Ariz. 2018
Teufel v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co. 419 P.3d 546 Ariz. 2018
Teufel v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co. 419 P.3d 546 Ariz. 2018
Co. , , 331-32, , 224-25 (1973).
Dennis Teufel v. American family/kerry Hanson Ariz. 2018
Teufel v. American Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Teufel v. American Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Quihuis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 334 P.3d 719 Ariz. 2014
Quihuis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 334 P.3d 719 Ariz. 2014
Co., see also Morris, 154 Ariz. at 117, 741 P.2d at 250 (“[T]he insurer must defend claims potentially not covered and those that are groundless, false, or fraudulent.”).
Kobold v. Aetna Life Insurance 309 P.3d 924 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Kobold v. Aetna Life Insurance 309 P.3d 924 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Co., , (analyzing scope of risks contemplated by homeowner’s insurance policy coverage).
Regal Homes, Inc. v. CNA Insurance 171 P.3d 610 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Regal Homes, Inc. v. CNA Insurance 171 P.3d 610 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Co., , (discussing when the duty to defend arises).
Lennar Corp. v. Auto-Owners Insurance 151 P.3d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Lennar Corp. v. Auto-Owners Insurance 151 P.3d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Manterola v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 30 P.3d 639 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Manterola v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 30 P.3d 639 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Mora v. Phoenix Indemnity Insurance 996 P.2d 116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Mora v. Phoenix Indemnity Insurance 996 P.2d 116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
¶ 14 , Mora first claims that an insurer that breaches any aspect of its contract with the insured forfeits its right to intervene.
Lloyd v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 943 P.2d 729 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Lloyd v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 943 P.2d 729 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
California Casualty Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 913 P.2d 505 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
California Casualty Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 913 P.2d 505 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
424, 431 [ ] (1970) -331 [ ] (1973).
Northern Ins. Co. of New York v. Morgan 918 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Northern Ins. Co. of New York v. Morgan 918 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
City of Cottonwood v. James L. Fann Contracting, Inc. 877 P.2d 284 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
City of Cottonwood v. James L. Fann Contracting, Inc. 877 P.2d 284 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Phoenix Control System, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America 796 P.2d 463 Ariz. 1990
Phoenix Control System, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America 796 P.2d 463 Ariz. 1990
Fremont Indemnity Co. v. New England Reinsurance Co. 799 P.2d 862 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Fremont Indemnity Co. v. New England Reinsurance Co. 799 P.2d 862 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Corp. v. Advance Roofing & Supply Co. 788 P.2d 1227 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Corp. v. Advance Roofing & Supply Co. 788 P.2d 1227 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
The leading Arizona decision relating to an insurer’s
Phoenix Control Systems, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America 778 P.2d 1316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Phoenix Control Systems, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America 778 P.2d 1316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Hays 781 P.2d 38 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Hays 781 P.2d 38 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Security Insurance Co. of Hartford v. Andersen 763 P.2d 246 Ariz. 1988
Security Insurance Co. of Hartford v. Andersen 763 P.2d 246 Ariz. 1988
Co., , Lindus v. Northern Ins.
Anderson v. Martinez 762 P.2d 645 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Anderson v. Martinez 762 P.2d 645 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
for the proposition that an insurer who breaches one of its primary duties to its insured forfeits its right to intervene.
Stufflebeam v. Canadian Indemnity Co. 754 P.2d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Stufflebeam v. Canadian Indemnity Co. 754 P.2d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Holt v. Utica Mutual Insurance 759 P.2d 617 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Holt v. Utica Mutual Insurance 759 P.2d 617 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Co., , our supreme court stated: Where there are facts which might exclude coverage, the insurer cannot always defend with complete fidelity.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by