Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Kepner v. Western Fire Insurance Company, 509 P.2d 222.
- Security Insurance Co. of Hartford v. Andersen 763 P.2d 251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
-
Security Insurance Co. of Hartford v. Andersen
763 P.2d 251
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Co., , that an insurance company’s right to limit its liability and impose conditions and restrictions on its contractual obligations is limited by considerations of public policy.
- Ina Insurance Co. of North America v. Valley Forge Insurance 722 P.2d 975 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
-
Ina Insurance Co. of North America v. Valley Forge Insurance
722 P.2d 975
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
and Western Casualty & , The authorities on which Valley Forge relies for its argument that the complaint controls the right of indemnity are cases where the courts seem to equate the duty to defend with the duty to indemnif
- ARIZONA PROPERTY CAS. INS. GUAR. FUND v. Helme 735 P.2d 445 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
-
ARIZONA PROPERTY CAS. INS. GUAR. FUND v. Helme
735 P.2d 445
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
(complaint serves notice function).
- Transamerica Insurance Group v. Meere 694 P.2d 181 Ariz. 1984
- Transamerica Insurance Group v. Meere 694 P.2d 181 Ariz. 1984
- McGough v. Ins. Co. of North America 691 P.2d 738 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- McGough v. Ins. Co. of North America 691 P.2d 738 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- Hagen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance 675 P.2d 1340 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
-
Hagen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance
675 P.2d 1340
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
the court held that where the facts alleged in the complaint ostensibly bring the case within policy coverage, but other facts which are not reflected in the complaint plainly exclude policy coverage, the insurer has no duty to defend.
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Goettl 674 P.2d 869 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
-
Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Goettl
674 P.2d 869
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
the Arizona Supreme Court recognized that a homeowners policy appropriately excludes risks associated with business activities.
- Salvatierra v. National Indemnity Co. 648 P.2d 131 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
- Salvatierra v. National Indemnity Co. 648 P.2d 131 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
- Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Evans 636 P.2d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
-
Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Evans
636 P.2d 111
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. O’Brien, 24 Ariz.App.
- Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. International Spas of Arizona, Inc. 634 P.2d 3 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
-
Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. International Spas of Arizona, Inc.
634 P.2d 3
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
: If the complaint in the action brought against the insured upon its face alleges facts which come within the coverage of the liability policy, the insurer is obligated to assume the defense of the action, but if the alleged facts fail to bring the case within the policy coverage, the i
- Fuller v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 601 P.2d 1360 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
-
Fuller v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
601 P.2d 1360
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
decided after Dairyland, supra, the Arizona Supreme Court held that there is no absolute duty to defend an individual when the alleged facts ostensibly bring the case within the policy coverage but other facts which are not reflected in the complaint plainly take the case outside the policy cove
- Granite State Insurance v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. 573 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- Granite State Insurance v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. 573 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. O'Brien 535 P.2d 46 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
-
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. O'Brien
535 P.2d 46
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
See, , 22 Am.Jur.2d Declaratory Judgments § 46.
- Hartford Insurance Group v. Royal-Globe Company 517 P.2d 1117 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
-
Hartford Insurance Group v. Royal-Globe Company
517 P.2d 1117
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
The position that the “true facts”