Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Sorrell, 333 P.2d 1081.

66 citing documents.

State v. Tucker 759 P.2d 579 Ariz. 1988
State v. Tucker 759 P.2d 579 Ariz. 1988
rev’d, on other grounds, , ; see generally M. Udall & J. Livermore, Arizona Law of Evidence § 47 (1982).
State v. Bonney 701 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Bonney 701 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
A Yes.” , , , M. Udall and J. Livermore, Law of Evidence § 47 at 92 (2nd Ed.1982), and therefore, no error was committed.
State v. Lozano 588 P.2d 841 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Lozano 588 P.2d 841 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Sustaita 583 P.2d 239 Ariz. 1978
State v. Sustaita 583 P.2d 239 Ariz. 1978
P. 458 (1923); , 208 P. 412 (1922).
Segovia v. Industrial Commission 580 P.2d 369 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Segovia v. Industrial Commission 580 P.2d 369 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State v. Killian 577 P.2d 259 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Killian 577 P.2d 259 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Cobb 566 P.2d 285 Ariz. 1977
State v. Cobb 566 P.2d 285 Ariz. 1977
State v. Kiser 529 P.2d 215 Ariz. 1974
State v. Kiser 529 P.2d 215 Ariz. 1974
This court has held that a witness may be impeached by the showing of a prior felony conviction, , and this is true even though the prior felony convicr tion relied upon is on appeal at the time of the impeachment.
State v. Ballinger 520 P.2d 294 Ariz. 1974
State v. Ballinger 520 P.2d 294 Ariz. 1974
The rule is well settled in this jurisdiction that a witness may be impeached by the showing of a prior felony conviction, , except where it is so remote as to be irrelevant to his present credibility.
State v. Hutton 509 P.2d 626 Ariz. 1973
State v. Hutton 509 P.2d 626 Ariz. 1973
If any answer of the defendant in this regard is incorrect, or if he claims he does not remember, or if he denies such conviction or equivocates in his response to questions as to conviction of felonious crimes, the facts of his conviction or convictions may be shown by the record thereof.” -178 , -1084 (1959).
State v. Forgan 505 P.2d 562 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Forgan 505 P.2d 562 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Stevens 490 P.2d 571 Ariz. 1971
State v. Stevens 490 P.2d 571 Ariz. 1971
State v. Beard 489 P.2d 25 Ariz. 1971
State v. Beard 489 P.2d 25 Ariz. 1971
State v. Sample 489 P.2d 44 Ariz. 1971
State v. Sample 489 P.2d 44 Ariz. 1971
For the general rule on impeachment on cross-examination by the showing of prior felony conviction *411
State v. Mendoza 481 P.2d 844 Ariz. 1971
State v. Mendoza 481 P.2d 844 Ariz. 1971
If the answer is in the affirmative he may be asked the number of such convictions, the names and nature of the crimes, and the places where they were committed * * *.” , 1084 (1959).
State v. Reeden 477 P.2d 240 Ariz. 1970
State v. Reeden 477 P.2d 240 Ariz. 1970
“In Arizona, a witness may be impeached by the showing of a prior felony conviction, , ; , , except where the prior felony conviction is so remote that it cannot reasonably cast a reflection on the witness’s credibility, , .
State v. Rackley 477 P.2d 255 Ariz. 1970
State v. Rackley 477 P.2d 255 Ariz. 1970
In the instant case the jury was instructed as to every possible lesser degree and valid possible excuse under the evidence and that the instructions as a whole were both fair and proper statements of the law, , ; , .
State v. Bernal 475 P.2d 6 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
State v. Bernal 475 P.2d 6 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
State v. Phillips 430 P.2d 139 Ariz. 1967
State v. Phillips 430 P.2d 139 Ariz. 1967
State v. Foggy 420 P.2d 934 Ariz. 1966
State v. Foggy 420 P.2d 934 Ariz. 1966
i. e. that his inquiries be limited to the number of such convictions,' the names and nature of the crimes and the places where they were committed, we find no error in admitting the evidence.
State v. Copley 418 P.2d 579 Ariz. 1966
State v. Copley 418 P.2d 579 Ariz. 1966
State v. Robison 408 P.2d 29 Ariz. 1965
State v. Robison 408 P.2d 29 Ariz. 1965
State v. Goodyear 404 P.2d 397 Ariz. 1965
State v. Goodyear 404 P.2d 397 Ariz. 1965
212 P. 458 (1923) ; *318 , 208 P. 412 (1922).
State v. Boodry 394 P.2d 196 Ariz. 1964
State v. Boodry 394 P.2d 196 Ariz. 1964
State v. Corrales 391 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1964
State v. Corrales 391 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1964
212 P. 458 (1923) ; , 208 P. 412 (1922).