Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Padilla v. Industrial Commission, 546 P.2d 1135.

61 citing documents.

Bowslaugh v. Bowslaugh 617 P.2d 25 Ariz. 1979
we stated: The most basic rule of statutory construction is that in construing the legislative language, courts will not enlarge the meaning of simple English words in order to make them conform to their own peculiar sociological and economic views.
McEldowney v. Osborn School District No. 8 600 P.2d 29 Ariz. 1979
McEldowney v. Osborn School District No. 8 600 P.2d 29 Ariz. 1979
Dewitt v. Magma Copper Co., 16 Ariz.App.
Gulf Homes, Inc. v. Bear 599 P.2d 831 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Gulf Homes, Inc. v. Bear 599 P.2d 831 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Castregon v. Huerta 580 P.2d 1197 Ariz. 1978
Castregon v. Huerta 580 P.2d 1197 Ariz. 1978
State v. Mercer 570 P.2d 484 Ariz. 1977
State v. Mercer 570 P.2d 484 Ariz. 1977
Equally fundamental is the presumption that what the Legislature means, it will say.”
Schmitz v. Industrial Commission 549 P.2d 184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Schmitz v. Industrial Commission 549 P.2d 184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
The mere fact that judges of this Court may now feel that, based upon today’s economic conditions the ceiling has been set too low, cannot logically lead to the conclusion that the ceiling is “an absurdity such as cannot be contem *407 plated the legislature [people] intended.” As stated in Padilla v. Industrial Commission, Ariz., : “The most basic rule of statutory construction is that in construing the legislative language, courts will not enlarge the meaning of simple English words in order t