Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Alsbrooks v. Industrial Commission, 578 P.2d 159.

92 citing documents.

Special Fund v. Rey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Special Fund v. Rey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Rubio v. Maricopa co/sentry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Rubio v. Maricopa co/sentry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Linda Bell v. Ica/ Maricopa Cty/ Pinnacle Risk 341 P.3d 1149 Ariz. 2015
Linda Bell v. Ica/ Maricopa Cty/ Pinnacle Risk 341 P.3d 1149 Ariz. 2015
Osman v. tungland/scf Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Osman v. tungland/scf Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Jose A. Escobar v. Marshall Foundation and Pinnacle Risk Management 285 P.3d 318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Jose A. Escobar v. Marshall Foundation and Pinnacle Risk Management 285 P.3d 318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Comm’n, (subsection (E) requires successive, scheduled injury to be treated as unscheduled); All Star Coach, Inc. v. Indus.
Young v. Industrial Commission 63 P.3d 298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Young v. Industrial Commission 63 P.3d 298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Special Fund Division v. Tabor 32 P.3d 14 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Special Fund Division v. Tabor 32 P.3d 14 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Comm’n, , (defining “disability” to mean earning capacity disability).
Special Fund Division v. Arizona Department of Transportation 8 P.3d 412 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Special Fund Division v. Arizona Department of Transportation 8 P.3d 412 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
See Alsbrooks v. Industrial Comm’n, , Ossic, 46 Ariz. at 189 , 49 P.2d at 402 ; Hoppin, 143 Ariz. at 122-23 , 692 P.2d at 301-02 .
PFS v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 955 P.2d 30 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
PFS v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 955 P.2d 30 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Alsbrooks v. Industrial Comm’n
Vargas v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 926 P.2d 533 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Vargas v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 926 P.2d 533 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Alsbrooks v. Industrial Comm’n
Universal Roofers v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ. 931 P.2d 1130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Universal Roofers v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ. 931 P.2d 1130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
The disability status changed when, after hearings; the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) found that the employee had a preexisting disability from a back injury and, therefore, the “instant claim should be closed as unscheduled.” See Alsbrooks v. Industrial Comm’n, -84 , -63 (1978) (holding that physical impairment from previous, nonindustrial injury that is also earning capacity disability unschedules subsequent scheduled industrial injury).
Fry's Food Stores v. Industrial Commission 866 P.2d 1350 Ariz. 1994
Fry's Food Stores v. Industrial Commission 866 P.2d 1350 Ariz. 1994
Conner Mfg., Gallardo v. Industrial Commission, 16 Ariz.App.
Martinez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 856 P.2d 1197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Martinez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 856 P.2d 1197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
When “the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous and conveys a clear and definite meaning,” statutory interpretation is unnecessary, “and courts must follow the meaning of the statute as written.” Ross (Robert) v. Industrial Comm’n, , overruled on other grounds, Alsbrooks v. Industrial Comm’n, 118 * P.2d 159 (1978).
Beasley v. Industrial Commission 858 P.2d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Beasley v. Industrial Commission 858 P.2d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
vacated on other grounds, , the claimant had a preexisting nonindustrial condition, a cataract, in one eye.
Conner Manufacturing, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 836 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Conner Manufacturing, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 836 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Rather, the court has defined “disability” broadly to mean “impairment of earning power generally.” Alsbrooks v. Industrial Comm’n, , (quoting Savich v. Industrial Comm’n, , ).
Wyckoff v. Industrial Commission 819 P.2d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Wyckoff v. Industrial Commission 819 P.2d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
See Alsbrooks v. Industrial Comm’n
Adams Insulation Co. v. Industrial Commission 789 P.2d 1056 Ariz. 1990
Adams Insulation Co. v. Industrial Commission 789 P.2d 1056 Ariz. 1990
Alsbrooks v. Industrial Comm’n, , (Struckmeyer, J., dissenting in part).
W.F. Dunn, Sr. & Son v. Industrial Commission 773 P.2d 241 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
W.F. Dunn, Sr. & Son v. Industrial Commission 773 P.2d 241 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
§ 23-1044(E); Alsbrooks v. Industrial Comm’n
Adams Insulation Co. v. Industrial Commission 763 P.2d 271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Adams Insulation Co. v. Industrial Commission 763 P.2d 271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Alva v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 750 P.2d 28 Ariz. 1988
Alva v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 750 P.2d 28 Ariz. 1988
Alsbrooks v. Industrial Comm’n
Slover Masonry, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 745 P.2d 958 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Slover Masonry, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 745 P.2d 958 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Alsbrooks v. Industrial Comm’n, , Smith .
Alva v. Industrial Commission 750 P.2d 25 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Alva v. Industrial Commission 750 P.2d 25 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Cassey v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 731 P.2d 645 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Cassey v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 731 P.2d 645 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Gomez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 716 P.2d 32 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Gomez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 716 P.2d 32 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
§ 23-1044(B); -82 , -61 (1978).” 135 Ariz. at 61, .
County of Maricopa v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 699 P.2d 389 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
County of Maricopa v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 699 P.2d 389 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
the supreme court discussed the term “disability” appearing in A.R.S.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by