Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Alsbrooks v. Industrial Commission, 578 P.2d 159.

92 citing documents.

Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission 697 P.2d 1089 Ariz. 1985
Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission 697 P.2d 1089 Ariz. 1985
Borsch v. Industrial Commission, 127 * P.2d 218 (1980)
Crowley Construction Co. v. Industrial Commission 694 P.2d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Crowley Construction Co. v. Industrial Commission 694 P.2d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
American Insurance v. Industrial Commission 697 P.2d 1114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
American Ins. Co. v. Indus. Com'n of Arizona 697 P.2d 1114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
American Ins. Co. v. Indus. Com'n of Arizona 697 P.2d 1114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
American Insurance v. Industrial Commission 697 P.2d 1114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
First, under Arizona law, “disability” means “an earning capacity disability.”
Hoppin v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ. 692 P.2d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Hoppin v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ. 692 P.2d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Cementation Co. of America, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 680 P.2d 186 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Cementation Co. of America, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 680 P.2d 186 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Dutra v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 659 P.2d 18 Ariz. 1983
Dutra v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 659 P.2d 18 Ariz. 1983
§ 23 — 1044(B); -82 , -61 (1978).
Arrowhead Press, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 653 P.2d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Arrowhead Press, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 653 P.2d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
overruled on other grounds, , which held that the carrier was not responsible for treatment for claimant’s non-industrially injured eye.
Pullins v. Industrial Commission 645 P.2d 807 Ariz. 1982
Pullins v. Industrial Commission 645 P.2d 807 Ariz. 1982
Kovacs v. Industrial Commission 644 P.2d 909 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Kovacs v. Industrial Commission 644 P.2d 909 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
§ 23 — 1044B(15) and (21), but apparently contends that because of a prior back injury, , acts to convert his present injury from a scheduled to an unscheduled classification.
Asbestos Engineering & Supply Co. v. Industrial Commission 642 P.2d 903 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Asbestos Engineering & Supply Co. v. Industrial Commission 642 P.2d 903 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
The applicant has sustained his burden of proof to show that he had a preexisting impairment of the eyes which had resulted in adversely affecting his earning capacity at the time of his subsequent injury:
Reddel v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 640 P.2d 194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Reddel v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 640 P.2d 194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Hunter v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 633 P.2d 1052 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Hunter v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 633 P.2d 1052 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
1 “Determination of permanent impairment is a medical question while evaluation of a permanent disability is a law question.”
Borsh v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 620 P.2d 218 Ariz. 1980
Borsh v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 620 P.2d 218 Ariz. 1980
Lewis v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 614 P.2d 347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Lewis v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 614 P.2d 347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
233 , the court held that preexisting hypertension, if shown to be partially disabling at the time of injury, would convert a 50% loss of function in the left leg into the unscheduled category- In the award here, , to support his “injury or accident” prerequisite: We do not believe that any physical impairment, the result of a prior non-industrial accident, is a “previous disability” for the purposes of Paragraph E [of A.R.S.
Alsbrooks v. Industrial Commission 616 P.2d 929 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Alsbrooks v. Industrial Commission 616 P.2d 929 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
R. G. Roth Construction Co. v. Industrial Commission 613 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
R. G. Roth Construction Co. v. Industrial Commission 613 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Although there may have existed considerable confusion in Arizona law as to the interpretation of § 23-1044 E prior to the Arizona Supreme Court’s , hopefully that confusion has now been eliminated.
Modern Industries, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 609 P.2d 98 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Modern Industries, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 609 P.2d 98 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
in ordér to convert a subsequent scheduled injury into the unscheduled class, a loss of earning capacity attributable to a prior injury must exist at the time of the subsequent injury.
Elmer Shelton Concrete Contractor, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 598 P.2d 1019 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Elmer Shelton Concrete Contractor, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 598 P.2d 1019 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Four days after the hearing officer issued his decision, our Supreme Court released its opinion in the important case of Alsbrooks *202 v. Industrial Commission
Miller v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 595 P.2d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Miller v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 595 P.2d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Wiedmaier v. Industrial Commission 589 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1978
Wiedmaier v. Industrial Commission 589 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1978

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by