Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Narten, 407 P.2d 81.

98 citing documents.

State v. Colorado 535 P.3d 941 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Colorado 535 P.3d 941 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
pon that issue should not be set aside by the appellate court unless the error is manifest.”); Ariz. Code §§ 44-1313(j), -1314 (1939); Ariz. Rev. Code §§ 5035(13), 5036 (1928); Rev. Stat. Ariz., Penal Code §§ 1023(13), 1024–25 (1913); –99 ¶¶ 113–21 (2019); –22 n.1 (1965); -36 (1928); see also Ariz. R. Crim.
State of Arizona v. James Clayton Johnson Ariz. 2019
State of Arizona v. James Clayton Johnson Ariz. 2019
However, a “prospective juror need not be disqualified unless his opinion is 35 STATE V. JOHNSON Opinion of the Court unqualified” or “fixed.”
State v. Kennedy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Kennedy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Higuera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Higuera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-37, -91 (1970); (concluding that the following comments made by prosecutor regarding his previous service on the bench were not improper: “You know, this presumption of innocence is great.
State of Arizona v. Johnathan Ian Burns 344 P.3d 303 Ariz. 2015
State of Arizona v. Johnathan Ian Burns 344 P.3d 303 Ariz. 2015
¶13 Although denying counsel adequate time to prepare a case for trial may deny the defendant a substantial right, time constraints by themselves do not create prejudice.
State v. Pete J. Vanwinkle 285 P.3d 308 Ariz. 2012
State v. Pete J. Vanwinkle 285 P.3d 308 Ariz. 2012
¶10 Although we recognize that defense counsel must be allowed sufficient time to prepare, we cannot conclude on this record that the trial court abused its discretion.
State v. Bolton 896 P.2d 830 Ariz. 1995
State v. Bolton 896 P.2d 830 Ariz. 1995
“It is not the province of an appellate court to pass upon questions not acted upon by the court from which the appeal is taken.” , cert.
State v. Rojas 868 P.2d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Rojas 868 P.2d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
See, e.g., Thomas, 130 Ariz. at 436 , 636 P.2d at 1218 ; Tison, 129 Ariz. at 533 , 633 P.2d at 342 ; , cert.
State v. Mauro 716 P.2d 393 Ariz. 1986
State v. Mauro 716 P.2d 393 Ariz. 1986
In the Narten cases, , cert.
State v. Summerlin 675 P.2d 686 Ariz. 1983
State v. Summerlin 675 P.2d 686 Ariz. 1983
State v. Vasquez 634 P.2d 391 Ariz. 1981
State v. Vasquez 634 P.2d 391 Ariz. 1981
2031, 2036 , 44 L.Ed.2d 589, 594-95 (1975); see State v. (Ricky) Tison, , , cert, denied, 384 U.S. 1008 , 86 S.Ct.
State v. Tison 633 P.2d 335 Ariz. 1981
Overruled State v. Tison 633 P.2d 335 Ariz. 1981
The challenge is overruled.” , as denying him due process because it permits jurors with a preconceived notion of the guilt or innocence of the accused to sit on the jury.
State v. Laffoon 610 P.2d 1045 Ariz. 1980
State v. Laffoon 610 P.2d 1045 Ariz. 1980
State v. Pawley 599 P.2d 840 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
State v. Pawley 599 P.2d 840 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
State v. Reinhold 597 P.2d 532 Ariz. 1979
State v. Reinhold 597 P.2d 532 Ariz. 1979
State v. Rose 589 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1978
State v. Rose 589 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1978
State v. Caldwell 573 P.2d 864 Ariz. 1977
State v. Caldwell 573 P.2d 864 Ariz. 1977
State v. Grubbs 570 P.2d 1289 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Grubbs 570 P.2d 1289 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
1065 , 13 L.Ed.2d 923 (1965)
State v. Rice 568 P.2d 1080 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Rice 568 P.2d 1080 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Valenzuela 559 P.2d 201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Valenzuela 559 P.2d 201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
the court held, “The court in the exercise of sound discretion may permit one to cross-examine his own witness upon an adequate showing of surprise, or that the witness is hostile to the party calling him or unwilling to testify.” 99 Ariz. at 121 , 407 P.2d at 84 .
State v. Castoe 559 P.2d 167 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Castoe 559 P.2d 167 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Urias 553 P.2d 1230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Urias 553 P.2d 1230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Brosie 540 P.2d 136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
State v. Brosie 540 P.2d 136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
State v. Hilliard, supra.
State v. Ferrari 541 P.2d 921 Ariz. 1975
State v. Ferrari 541 P.2d 921 Ariz. 1975
P.2d 81 (1965), cert, denied, 384 U.S. 1008 , 86 S. Ct. 1985 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1021 (1966)