Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Societe Jean Nicolas Et Fils v. Mousseux, 597 P.2d 541.

28 citing documents.

Greenboom v. Ran Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Greenboom v. Ran Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
(“[A] forum selection clause that is fairly bargained for and not the result of fraud will be enforced so long as to do so is reasonable at the time of litigation and does not deprive a litigant of his day in court.”).
Matthew Cavallo v. Phoenix Health Plans Inc Ariz. 2022
Matthew Cavallo v. Phoenix Health Plans Inc Ariz. 2022
v. Mohave-Kingman Ests., Inc., (“Waiver is an intentional relinquishment of a known right.”); (“We find no clear showing of an intent to waive a right as is required by our case law.”).
Rt Automotive v. Westlake Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Rt Automotive v. Westlake Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
3 RT AUTOMOTIVE, et al. v. WESTLAKE Opinion of the Court so long as to do so is reasonable at the time of litigation and does not deprive a litigant of his day in court.”
Dunn v. Fastmed Urgent Care PC 424 P.3d 436 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Dunn v. Fastmed Urgent Care PC 424 P.3d 436 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Societe Jean Nicolas Et Fils v. Mousseux , , 61, , 543 (1979).
Dmarc 2006-Cd2 v. Bush Realty Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Dmarc 2006-Cd2 v. Bush Realty Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
A “forum selection clause that is fairly bargained for and not the result of fraud will be enforced so long as to do so is reasonable at the time of litigation and does not deprive a litigant of his day in court.”
Russo v. Barger 366 P.3d 577 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Russo v. Barger 366 P.3d 577 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See, (“[A] forum selection clause that is fairly bargained for and not the result of fraud will be enforced so long as to do so is reasonable at the time of litigation.”).
Rigoli v. 44 Monroe Marketing, LLC 336 P.3d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Rigoli v. 44 Monroe Marketing, LLC 336 P.3d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Dessarollo Immobiliario Y Negocios Industriales De Alta Tecnologia De Hermosillo v. Kader Holdings Company Limited Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Dessarollo Immobiliario Y Negocios Industriales De Alta Tecnologia De Hermosillo v. Kader Holdings Company Limited Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
VERMA v. Stuhr 221 P.3d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
VERMA v. Stuhr 221 P.3d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Bennett v. Appaloosa Horse Club 35 P.3d 426 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Bennett v. Appaloosa Horse Club 35 P.3d 426 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
to make findings as *375 to the adhesive nature of the contract, and, if the contract was found to be adhesive, to determine the reasonable expectations of the adhering party and the unconscionability of the contract term, and to determine the forum selection clause’s general enforceability.
Services Holding Co. v. Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance 883 P.2d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Services Holding Co. v. Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance 883 P.2d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Morgan Bank (Delaware) v. Wilson 794 P.2d 959 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Morgan Bank (Delaware) v. Wilson 794 P.2d 959 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
1907 , 32 L.Ed.2d 513 (1972), has been embraced by some state courts, , Inti Collection Serv., Inc. v. Gibbs, 147 Vt. 105 , 510 A.2d 1325 (1986); and it has been modified by some, Prudential Resources Corp. v. Plunkett, 583 S.W.2d 97 (Ky.App.1979).
Goglia v. Bodnar 749 P.2d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Goglia v. Bodnar 749 P.2d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
C. Itoh Industrial Machinery, Inc. v. Lift Line, Ltd. 665 P.2d 106 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Distinguished C. Itoh Industrial Machinery, Inc. v. Lift Line, Ltd. 665 P.2d 106 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983