Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Karol v. Board of Education Trustees, 593 P.2d 649.

34 citing documents.

Charbel v. Joyece Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Charbel v. Joyece Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
No. One, 5 CHARBEL v. JOYCE, et al. Decision of the Court (“[E]quity gives little weight to technicalities [because] it looks to substance rather than form.”).
Desert Mountain v. Flagstaff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Desert Mountain v. Flagstaff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
David Welch v. Cochise Board of Supervisors Ariz. 2021
David Welch v. Cochise Board of Supervisors Ariz. 2021
East Valley v. Mahoney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
East Valley v. Mahoney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Long v. City of Glendale 93 P.3d 519 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Long v. City of Glendale 93 P.3d 519 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
TANQUE VERDE UNIFIED SCHOOL v. Bernini 76 P.3d 874 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
TANQUE VERDE UNIFIED SCHOOL v. Bernini 76 P.3d 874 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
City of Prescott v. Town of Chino Valley 803 P.2d 891 Ariz. 1990
City of Prescott v. Town of Chino Valley 803 P.2d 891 Ariz. 1990
Trustees, , ( , , ); see Gortarez v. Smitty’s Super Valu, Inc.
City of Prescott v. Town of Chino Valley 790 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
City of Prescott v. Town of Chino Valley 790 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Trustees, , and Fossey and Roston, Invalidation as a Remedy for Violation of Open Meeting Statutes: Is the Cure Worse than the Disease, 20 U.S. L.F.Rev.
Thurston v. City of Phoenix 757 P.2d 619 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Thurston v. City of Phoenix 757 P.2d 619 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
See, , (failure of the board to allow non-teachers to tape-record the meeting in violation of A.R.S.
One Hundred Eighteen Members of Blue Sky Mobile Home Owners Ass'n v. Murdock 682 P.2d 422 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
One Hundred Eighteen Members of Blue Sky Mobile Home Owners Ass'n v. Murdock 682 P.2d 422 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Number One of Pinal County, , Greyhound Parks of Ariz., , , 281 P. 46 (1929).
Cooner v. Board of Education 663 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Cooner v. Board of Education 663 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
“The intent of the legislature was to open the conduct of the business of government to the scrutiny of the public and to ban decision-making in secret.”
Carefree Improvement Ass'n v. City of Scottsdale 649 P.2d 985 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Carefree Improvement Ass'n v. City of Scottsdale 649 P.2d 985 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
§ 38-431(2) —“be conducted openly.”
Boyd v. Mary E. Dill School District No. 51 631 P.2d 577 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Boyd v. Mary E. Dill School District No. 51 631 P.2d 577 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
for the proposition that the formulation of an intention not to renew a teaching contract is “legal action” within the meaning of the Arizona open-meeting statute, A.R.S.
Ahnert v. Sunnyside Unified School District 12 616 P.2d 933 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Ahnert v. Sunnyside Unified School District 12 616 P.2d 933 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Karol v. Board of Education Trustees, Florence Unified School District Number One of Pinal County
Peck v. Board of Education of Yuma Union High School District 612 P.2d 1076 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Peck v. Board of Education of Yuma Union High School District 612 P.2d 1076 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
The recent opinion of our Supreme Court in Karol v. Board of Education Trustees, Florence Unified School District Number One of Pinal County, , is of importance.
Cooper v. ARIZONA WESTERN COLLEGE, ETC. 610 P.2d 465 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Cooper v. ARIZONA WESTERN COLLEGE, ETC. 610 P.2d 465 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
held that "the formulation of the intention not to offer a contract ...
City of Flagstaff v. Bleeker 600 P.2d 49 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
City of Flagstaff v. Bleeker 600 P.2d 49 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979