DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Burrell, 393 P.2d 921.

140 citing documents.

  • State v. Rose 589 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1978
  • State v. Rose 589 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1978
    § 13 — 1715 B, , , in doing so it is necessarily limited to a study of the evidence presented *142 in the record.
  • State v. Davis 539 P.2d 897 Ariz. 1975
  • State v. Davis 539 P.2d 897 Ariz. 1975
    § 13-1715, P.2d 921 (1964), and Anders v. California, supra.
  • State v. Dodds 537 P.2d 970 Ariz. 1975
  • State v. Dodds 537 P.2d 970 Ariz. 1975
    § 13-1715; , and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. Lawrence 536 P.2d 1038 Ariz. 1975
  • State v. Lawrence 536 P.2d 1038 Ariz. 1975
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), , and A.R.S.
  • State v. Villa 530 P.2d 363 Ariz. 1975
  • State v. Villa 530 P.2d 363 Ariz. 1975
    § 13-1715 , and conclude, as did counsel for the state, that there is no reversible error in the record.
  • State v. Gamble 523 P.2d 53 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Gamble 523 P.2d 53 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Jaramillo 520 P.2d 1105 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Jaramillo 520 P.2d 1105 Ariz. 1974
    § 13-1715 , and we are satisfied that there is no fundamental error elsewhere in the record.
  • State v. Munoz 520 P.2d 291 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Munoz 520 P.2d 291 Ariz. 1974
    We have reviewed the record as required by § 13-1715 A.R.S.
  • State v. James 519 P.2d 33 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. James 519 P.2d 33 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Clayton 514 P.2d 720 Ariz. 1973
  • State v. Clayton 514 P.2d 720 Ariz. 1973
  • State v. Schmid 509 P.2d 619 Ariz. 1973
  • State v. Schmid 509 P.2d 619 Ariz. 1973
  • State v. Hodges 507 P.2d 121 Ariz. 1973
  • State v. Matlock 507 P.2d 118 Ariz. 1973
  • State v. Hodges 507 P.2d 121 Ariz. 1973
    § 13-1715; , and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. Matlock 507 P.2d 118 Ariz. 1973
    § 13-1715; , and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. Terrell 506 P.2d 1029 Ariz. 1973
  • State v. DeGrate 506 P.2d 1037 Ariz. 1973
  • State v. Fitch 506 P.2d 1063 Ariz. 1973
  • State v. Flores 506 P.2d 1057 Ariz. 1973
  • State v. Thornhill 506 P.2d 1048 Ariz. 1973
  • State v. Thornhill 506 P.2d 1047 Ariz. 1973
  • State v. Brock 506 P.2d 1050 Ariz. 1973
  • State v. Anderson 506 P.2d 1052 Ariz. 1973
  • State v. Taylor 506 P.2d 1034 Ariz. 1973
  • State v. Terrell 506 P.2d 1029 Ariz. 1973
    We have reviewed the entire record as required by § 13-1715 A.R.S., , and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , *137 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. Taylor 506 P.2d 1034 Ariz. 1973
    We have reviewed the entire record as required by § 13-1715 A.R.S., , and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. Thornhill 506 P.2d 1048 Ariz. 1973
    We have reviewed the entire record as required by § 13-1715 A.R.S., , and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. Brock 506 P.2d 1050 Ariz. 1973
    We have reviewed the entire record as required by § 13-1715 A.R.S., , and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. Thornhill 506 P.2d 1047 Ariz. 1973
    We have reviewed the entire record as required by § 13-1715 A.R.S., , and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. Anderson 506 P.2d 1052 Ariz. 1973
    We have reviewed the entire record as required by § 13-1715 A.R.S., , and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. Flores 506 P.2d 1057 Ariz. 1973
    We have reviewed the entire record as required by § 13 — 1715 A.R.S., , and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. Fitch 506 P.2d 1063 Ariz. 1973
    FUNDAMENTAL ERROR We have reviewed the entire record for fundamental error as required by § 13-1715 A.R.S., , and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. DeGrate 506 P.2d 1037 Ariz. 1973
    We have reviewed the entire record as required by § 13-1715 A.R.S., , and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. Brown 489 P.2d 12 Ariz. 1971
  • State v. Brown 489 P.2d 12 Ariz. 1971
    Conclusion We have reviewed the entire record as required by § 13-1715 A.R.S., , and as required by Anders v. California, supra, in cases wherein the attorney is unable to find error.
  • State v. Campbell 488 P.2d 968 Ariz. 1971
  • State v. Campbell 488 P.2d 968 Ariz. 1971
    V. Conclusion We have reviewed the entire record as required by § 13-1715 A.R.S., , and as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. Laurino 480 P.2d 342 Ariz. 1971
  • State v. Laurino 480 P.2d 342 Ariz. 1971
    We have reviewed the entire record as required by § 13-1715 A.R.S., , and as required by Anders v. California, supra, in cases wherein the attorney is unable to find error.