Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Burrell, 393 P.2d 921.
- State v. Shumway 406 P.2d 241 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
-
State v. Shumway
406 P.2d 241
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Having searched the entire record before this Court, , , (1964), and Rugg v. Burr, 1 Ariz.App.
- State v. Stone 405 P.2d 807 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Pacheco 405 P.2d 809 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Stone 405 P.2d 807 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Pacheco 405 P.2d 809 Ariz. 1965
- Rugg v. Burr 404 P.2d 832 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
-
Rugg v. Burr
404 P.2d 832
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
In accordance with the doctrine laid down by the Supreme Court of this State on many occasions and particularly in State v. Burrell (1964), , , where counsel has advised the court by written communication that a search of the record has not disclosed grounds on which an appeal could be based, the appeal is considered submitted.
- State v. George 403 P.2d 932 Ariz. 1965
- State v. George 403 P.2d 932 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Vasquez 402 P.2d 574 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Vasquez 402 P.2d 574 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Tannahill 402 P.2d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
-
State v. Tannahill
402 P.2d 29
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
State v. Burrell (1964), , ; A.R.S.
- State v. Ortiz 402 P.2d 14 Ariz. 1965
-
State v. Ortiz
402 P.2d 14
Ariz. 1965
we said: “ * * * Counsel advised this court by written communication that he has searched the record and has been unable to find grounds on which an appeal could be based.
- State v. Smith 401 P.2d 739 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Smith 401 P.2d 739 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Mansfield 401 P.2d 409 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Mansfield 401 P.2d 409 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Szoyka 399 P.2d 121 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Szoyka 399 P.2d 121 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Montijo 398 P.2d 551 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Montijo 398 P.2d 551 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Maxwell 398 P.2d 548 Ariz. 1965
-
State v. Maxwell
398 P.2d 548
Ariz. 1965
On examination of the record, including the transcript of testimony, we find no reversible error, , .
- State v. Hanshaw 397 P.2d 220 Ariz. 1964
- State v. Rogers 397 P.2d 220 Ariz. 1964
- State v. Jacobi 397 P.2d 221 Ariz. 1964
-
State v. Jacobi
397 P.2d 221
Ariz. 1964
’ This Court lids ordered the appeal 'bé‘ submitted; On examíriatió'n' of the record' we find nci grounds'tlpdn'which-the appeal could1, be base, , .
- State v. Rogers 397 P.2d 220 Ariz. 1964
- State v. Hanshaw 397 P.2d 220 Ariz. 1964
- State v. Gamez 395 P.2d 531 Ariz. 1964
- State v. Gamez 395 P.2d 531 Ariz. 1964
- State v. Edge 394 P.2d 418 Ariz. 1964
- State v. Edge 394 P.2d 418 Ariz. 1964
- State v. Sanchez 391 P.2d 206 Ariz. 1964
- State v. Sanchez 391 P.2d 206 Ariz. 1964
- State v. Chavez 393 P.2d 906 Ariz. 1964
- State v. Chavez 393 P.2d 906 Ariz. 1964