Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Sparks v. Republic National Life Insurance, 647 P.2d 1127.
- Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. Lewallen 703 P.2d 1232 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- Colonial Villas, Inc. v. Title Insurance 703 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- Colonial Villas, Inc. v. Title Insurance 703 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Fireman's Fund Insurance 717 P.2d 909 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
-
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
717 P.2d 909
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
This court is not asked to interpret a policy dispute between insurer and insured, as in Darner Motor Sales, , , Zuckerman v. Transamerica Insurance Company, supra.
- United States Fire Insurance v. Gentile 712 P.2d 436 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- United States Fire Insurance v. Gentile 712 P.2d 436 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- Jerman v. O'LEARY 701 P.2d 1205 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- Jerman v. O'LEARY 701 P.2d 1205 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- Tanner Companies v. Superior Court 696 P.2d 693 Ariz. 1985
- Tanner Companies v. Superior Court 696 P.2d 693 Ariz. 1985
- Murdock v. Balle 696 P.2d 230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- Murdock v. Balle 696 P.2d 230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- Carpenter v. Carpenter 722 P.2d 298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- Carpenter v. Carpenter 722 P.2d 298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- Grunewald & Adams Jewelers, Inc. v. Lloyds of London 700 P.2d 888 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
-
Grunewald & Adams Jewelers, Inc. v. Lloyds of London
700 P.2d 888
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Co., , we will not submit to the handicap of viewing the policy provisions in question through a partially obscured window.
- Farr v. Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance 699 P.2d 376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- Farr v. Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance 699 P.2d 376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- Pettinato v. Industrial Commission 698 P.2d 746 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
-
Pettinato v. Industrial Commission
698 P.2d 746
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
For this reason, claimant’s , is misplaced.
- Prendergast v. City of Tempe 691 P.2d 726 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- Prendergast v. City of Tempe 691 P.2d 726 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- American National Fire Insurance v. Esquire Labs of Arizona, Inc. 694 P.2d 800 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
-
American National Fire Insurance v. Esquire Labs of Arizona, Inc.
694 P.2d 800
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
the parol evidence rule that parties may not vary the terms of a written agreement by introducing evidence contrary to the writing, the court also observed that the rule is not “strictly applied” to enforce a “bargain” that was never really made and would, if applied, defeat the true agreement which was supposedly contained in the policy, , , cert.
- Lake Havasu Community Hospital, Inc. v. Arizona Title Insurance 687 P.2d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- LAKE HAVASU COM. HOSP. v. Ariz. Title Ins. 687 P.2d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- LAKE HAVASU COM. HOSP. v. Ariz. Title Ins. 687 P.2d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- Lake Havasu Community Hospital, Inc. v. Arizona Title Insurance 687 P.2d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- Mid-Century Insurance v. Samaniego 681 P.2d 476 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- Mid-Century Insurance v. Samaniego 681 P.2d 476 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. Pearson 703 P.2d 1206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. Pearson 703 P.2d 1206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters Insurance 682 P.2d 388 Ariz. 1984
-
Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters Insurance
682 P.2d 388
Ariz. 1984
Co., -37 , -35 , *390 cert.
- Evenchik v. State Farm Insurance 679 P.2d 99 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- EVENCHIC v. State Farm Ins. Co. 679 P.2d 99 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
-
EVENCHIC v. State Farm Ins. Co.
679 P.2d 99
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
§ 20-259.01, as amended in 1981, and the doctrine of "reasonable expectations", see Zuckerman v. Transamerica Insurance Company, 133 Ariz. *458 139, , cert.
-
Evenchik v. State Farm Insurance
679 P.2d 99
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
§ 20-259.01, as amended in 1981, and the doctrine of “reasonable expectations”, see Zuckerman v. Transamerica Insurance Company, 133 Ariz. *458 139 , , cert.
- Lake Havasu Resort v. COMMERCIAL LOAN INS. 678 P.2d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- Tolifson v. Globe American Casualty Co. 672 P.2d 983 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- Tolifson v. Globe American Casualty Co. 672 P.2d 983 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- Lake Havasu Resort v. COMMERCIAL LOAN INS. 678 P.2d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Gibbs 678 P.2d 459 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Gibbs 678 P.2d 459 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Gibbs 678 P.2d 459 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Gibbs 678 P.2d 459 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- Brown v. Superior Court in & for Maricopa Cy. 670 P.2d 725 Ariz. 1983
-
Brown v. Superior Court in & for Maricopa Cy.
670 P.2d 725
Ariz. 1983
Co., , Noble v. National American Life Ins.
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Goettl 674 P.2d 869 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983