Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Sparks v. Republic National Life Insurance, 647 P.2d 1127.

415 citing documents.

Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Goettl 674 P.2d 869 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
ASH, Inc. v. Mesa Unified School District No. 4 673 P.2d 934 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
ASH, Inc. v. Mesa Unified School District No. 4 673 P.2d 934 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Vikse v. Johnson 672 P.2d 193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Vikse v. Johnson 672 P.2d 193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
General Insurance Co. of America v. Truly Nolen of America, Inc. 664 P.2d 686 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
General Insurance Co. of America v. Truly Nolen of America, Inc. 664 P.2d 686 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
the supreme court held that a brochure describing the terms of a health insurance policy established the contract rights of the parties despite contrary (but ambiguous) language in the insurance policy.
Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A. 653 P.2d 45 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A. 653 P.2d 45 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 652 P.2d 537 Ariz. 1982
Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 652 P.2d 537 Ariz. 1982
We have stated: “Where the language employed [in insurance policies] is unclear and can be reasonably construed in more than one sense, an ambiguity is said to exist and such ambiguity will be construed against the insurer.”
Almadova v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 649 P.2d 284 Ariz. 1982
Almadova v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 649 P.2d 284 Ariz. 1982
Zuckerman v. Transamerica Insurance 650 P.2d 441 Ariz. 1982
Zuckerman v. Transamerica Insurance 650 P.2d 441 Ariz. 1982