Cited by

¶ 10 (App. 2017); see also O’Hair v. O’Hair, -40 (1973).

But “on appeal the court must assume that the trial court found every fact necessary to support its judgment and must affirm if any reasonable construction of the evidence justifies the decision.” ¶ 25 (2021) () (cleaned up).

When neither party requests findings of fact and conclusions of law, “on appeal the court must assume the trial court found every fact necessary to support its judgment and must affirm if any reasonable construction of the evidence justifies the decision.”

Instead, for the proposition that “when separate funds are placed into a joint account, there is no presumption that the owner of the funds intended to gift half of the funds to the other spouse.” (Emphasis added.)

(stating that, on appeal, the appellate court presumes the superior court found every fact necessary and will affirm if any reasonable construction of the evidence supports the decision).

Neither party requested findings of fact, and we must therefore assume the superior court found every fact necessary to support the decree “if any reasonable construction of the evidence justifies the decision.”

(“[O]n appeal the court must assume that the trial court found every fact necessary to support its judgment and must affirm if any reasonable construction of the evidence justifies the decision.”).

We “must affirm if any reasonable construction of the evidence justifies the decision.”

“Whether evidence is sufficient to be clear and convincing is for the trial court and its findings will not be disturbed unless as a matter of law no one could reasonably find the evidence to be clear and convincing.”

the time that she needs to secure additional employment and arrange for any training she needs to secure appropriate employment.” ¶12 Although reasonable minds might differ regarding the amount and duration of the award, “[a] difference in judicial opinion is not synonymous with ‘abuse of discretion.’” (appellate court will affirm spousal maintenance award if any reasonable construction of the evidence justifies it).

On appeal, this “court must assume that the trial court found every fact necessary to support its judgment and must affirm if any reasonable construction of the evidence justifies the decision.”

Co. v. Banner Realty, Inc., 103 Ariz. 75, 79, or “if any reasonable construction of the evidence justifies the decision.”

" ¶ 9 , (alteration in original) ( , ), vacated in part on other grounds

Stevenson v. *982 Stevenson

Thus, we “must assume that the trial court found every fact necessary to support its [ruling] and must affirm if any reasonable construction of the evidence justifies the decision.” Stevenson v. *62 Stevenson