Cited by

Co., (citation omitted) (citation modified).

Co., (abuse of discretion occurs where “conclusion was reached without consideration of the evidence” or where “there is no substantial basis for the trial court’s discretionary finding”).

Co., (even on record that “could justify either a conclusion of prejudice or no 2As we explain below, what the officers knew about Paz’s mental health condition at the moment of the detention became relevant during trial.

Co., -50 (1982); (foreseeability used to determine breach of standard of care).

Co., (recognizing that appellate courts will not reverse “discretionary factual findings unless the record clearly establishes that the trial court was incorrect”).

Co., (“The granting or denial of a new trial on the grounds of misconduct of counsel is a matter within the trial court’s discretion.”).

Co., (stating that cumulative acts of ordinary negligence can amount to wanton negligence and justify punitive damages), vacated on other grounds

Co., 11 At oral argument, Beti’s appellate counsel argued the testimony of Mark Hyland, the clinical director at STI, established that AZ Therapy owed a duty to Beti and others using the STI equipment based on the 2013 version of Arizona Administrative Code (“A.A.C.”) R9-10-1030 and the oral agreement and cours

Co., (noting that ability to address exhibit at trial undermines generic assertion of prejudice from insufficient disclosure).

Co., -56 2 The superior court declined jurisdiction of the complaint and certified under Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 54(c) that no further matters remained pending.