Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Cook v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona, 651 P.2d 365.

34 citing documents.

Arizona Off Duty v. Good Vibe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Arizona Off Duty v. Good Vibe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Comm’n, (also noting workers’ compensation proceedings are not adversarial); Andrews v. Indus.
fry's/kroger v. Briles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
fry's/kroger v. Briles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Comm’n, which allows for waiver under certain conditions.
Porter v. Spader 239 P.3d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Porter v. Spader 239 P.3d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Comm’n, , (untimely request for review in an administrative action); Wilshire Mortgage Corp. v. Elmer Shelton Concrete Contractor, Inc., , (untimely answer leading to a default judgment); Coconino Pulp & , 317 P.2d
Martinez v. Industrial Commission 144 P.3d 1260 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Martinez v. Industrial Commission 144 P.3d 1260 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Hauskins v. McGillicuddy 852 P.2d 1226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Hauskins v. McGillicuddy 852 P.2d 1226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Corp. v. Elmer Shelton Concrete Contractor, Inc., , and Cook v. Industrial Comm’n of Arizona
Amey v. Industrial Commission 752 P.2d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Amey v. Industrial Commission 752 P.2d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Repair v. Industrial Comm’n, , see also Cook v. Industrial Comm’n, , (quoting Lugar with approval).
Sax v. Superior Court 711 P.2d 657 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Sax v. Superior Court 711 P.2d 657 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
which collects the pertinent cases.
Duron v. State ex rel. Department of Economic Security 699 P.2d 1330 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Duron v. State ex rel. Department of Economic Security 699 P.2d 1330 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission 697 P.2d 1089 Ariz. 1985
Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission 697 P.2d 1089 Ariz. 1985
Stainless Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial Commission 695 P.2d 261 Ariz. 1985
Stainless Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial Commission 695 P.2d 261 Ariz. 1985
Pascucci v. Industrial Commission, 126 Ariz. at 444 , 616 P.2d at 904
P.B. Bell & Associates v. Industrial Commission 690 P.2d 802 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
P.B. Bell & Associates v. Industrial Commission 690 P.2d 802 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
To any extent that the claimant’s argument was not determined by that order, , only allows the excusing of late requests for review by claimants, but not of late requests for review by employers and carriers.
United Asphalt v. Industrial Commission 685 P.2d 1361 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
United Asphalt v. Industrial Commission 685 P.2d 1361 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
In our opinion the Arizona Supreme Court’s , requires a reversal of the administrative law judge’s refusal to waive the untimely filing in this matter.
Daou v. Harris 678 P.2d 934 Ariz. 1984
Daou v. Harris 678 P.2d 934 Ariz. 1984
Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Industrial Commission 676 P.2d 1138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Industrial Commission 676 P.2d 1138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Israel v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 669 P.2d 102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Israel v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 669 P.2d 102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Nelson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 656 P.2d 1230 Ariz. 1982
Explained Nelson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 656 P.2d 1230 Ariz. 1982
we explained: [T]he purpose of workmen’s compensation is remedial.
Richas v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC. 652 P.2d 1035 Ariz. 1982
Richas v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC. 652 P.2d 1035 Ariz. 1982
In Cocon-ino Pulp & , and in other cases, the most recent of which is Cook v. Industrial Commission, et al., , we acknowledged that clerical and secretarial errors which occur in a large law office are often unavoidable and are ordinarily excusable.