Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Ryan v. State, 656 P.2d 597.

140 citing documents.

Johnson v. SUPERIOR COURT, PIMA COUNTY 763 P.2d 1382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Johnson v. SUPERIOR COURT, PIMA COUNTY 763 P.2d 1382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
§§ 12-820 to -826, and was enacted in the wake of our supreme court’s , which had overruled the last vestiges of governmental tort immunity and held that the state and its agents may be held liable for their acts and omissions as in the private sector.
City of Tucson v. Fahringer 781 P.2d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
City of Tucson v. Fahringer 781 P.2d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Chamberlain v. Mathis 729 P.2d 905 Ariz. 1986
Chamberlain v. Mathis 729 P.2d 905 Ariz. 1986
Ryan v. State 724 P.2d 1218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Ryan v. State 724 P.2d 1218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. 694 P.2d 198 Ariz. 1984
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. 694 P.2d 198 Ariz. 1984
Markowitz v. Arizona Parks Board 705 P.2d 937 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Markowitz v. Arizona Parks Board 705 P.2d 937 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Acevedo v. Pima County Adult Probation Department 690 P.2d 38 Ariz. 1984
Acevedo v. Pima County Adult Probation Department 690 P.2d 38 Ariz. 1984
Kenyon v. Hammer 688 P.2d 961 Ariz. 1984
Kenyon v. Hammer 688 P.2d 961 Ariz. 1984
Austin v. City of Scottsdale 684 P.2d 151 Ariz. 1984
Austin v. City of Scottsdale 684 P.2d 151 Ariz. 1984
announcing that: “We shall no longer engage in the speculative exercise of determining whether the tort-feasor has a general duty to the injured party, which spells no recovery, or if he had a specific individual duty which means recovery.
Coburn v. City of Tucson 691 P.2d 1104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Coburn v. City of Tucson 691 P.2d 1104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
The appellants’ , by analogy, creates a duty owing motorists unobstructed visibility at intersections.
State v. Superior Court of Maricopa Cy. 681 P.2d 1384 Ariz. 1984
State v. Superior Court of Maricopa Cy. 681 P.2d 1384 Ariz. 1984
(state is liable for the negligent acts of its agents); , (negligence action allowed to proceed against the state for alleged violation of, inter alia, statute requiring state to find and identify those drivers who, because of past h
Evans v. Arizona Dept. of Corrections 678 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Hernandez v. Maricopa County 673 P.2d 341 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Evans v. Arizona Dept. of Corrections 678 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Hernandez v. Maricopa County 673 P.2d 341 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
our Supreme Court noted the distinction between the doctrine of sovereign immunity (which has been abolished) and judicial immunity (which still obtains): In electing to treat the state like a private litigant, we must hasten to point out that certain areas of immunity must remain.
Acevedo v. Pima County Adult Probation Department 690 P.2d 79 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Acevedo v. Pima County Adult Probation Department 690 P.2d 79 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
1335 at 1338 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1434 at 1440 (1959).” Although the immunity traditionally granted public officials has been diminished by recent Arizona case law, , , , judicial immunity has remained unscathed.
Mammo v. State 675 P.2d 1347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Mammo v. State 675 P.2d 1347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
filed after briefing in this appeal, in which the Arizona Supreme Court overruled Massengill and adopted a different test for determining the duty owed by the state.
Davis v. Mangelsdorf 673 P.2d 951 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Davis v. Mangelsdorf 673 P.2d 951 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
185 (D.Neb.1980); , Bradley Center, Inc. v. Wessner, 161 Ga.App.
Beach v. City of Phoenix 667 P.2d 1316 Ariz. 1983
Beach v. City of Phoenix 667 P.2d 1316 Ariz. 1983
Ontiveros v. Borak 667 P.2d 200 Ariz. 1983
Ontiveros v. Borak 667 P.2d 200 Ariz. 1983
Bischofshausen v. Pinal-Gila Counties Air Quality Control District 673 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Bischofshausen v. Pinal-Gila Counties Air Quality Control District 673 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
After the initial briefs had been filed in this appeal, , which overturned Massengill and abrogated the doctrine of public vs. private duty as being determinative of the issue of governmental immunity.
Brown v. Syson 663 P.2d 251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Brown v. Syson 663 P.2d 251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
we must reverse the trial court’s granting of the defense motion for summary judgment.