Cited by

in that same section, subsection C mandates that claimed expenses must be reasonable and necessary, setting forth factors a court may consider, including a catch-all for “[a]ny other factors bearing on the reasonableness of fees.” ¶19 The next section, § 14-5110(A), creates an additional requirement—deadlines for filing fee petitions—and does specify a involved.”); (“In pari materia is a rule of statutory construction whereby the meaning and application of a specific statute or portion of a stat

(“Statutes in pari materia must be read together and all parts of the law on the same subject must be given effect, if possible.”).

Reading a statute in pari materia requires “looking to statutes which relate to the same person or thing and which have a purpose similar to that of the statute being construed.”

We should “not 29 VANGILDER, ET AL. V. PINAL COUNTY, ET AL. JUSTICE MONTGOMERY, joined by JUSTICES LOPEZ and BEENE, Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part read into a statute something that is not within the manifest intent of the Legislature as gathered from the statute itself.”

(“Courts will not read into a statute something that is not within the manifest intent of the Legislature as gathered from the statute itself.”).

(“Courts will not read into a statute something that is not within the manifest intent of the Legislature as gathered from the statute itself.”).

Collins v. Stockwell , , 419

(alteration in Womack ) (quoting Collins v. Stockwell , , 420, , 398 (1983) ) ).

(we “will not read into a statute something that is not within the manifest intent of the Legislature as gathered from the statute itself”).

(“Courts will not read into a statute something that is not within the manifest intent of the Legislature as gathered from the statute itself.”).

“Courts will not read into a statute something that is not within the manifest intent of the Legislature as gathered from the statute itself.”

(“Courts will not read into a statute something that is not within the manifest intent of the Legislature as gathered from the statute itself.”).2 CONCLUSION ¶24 Because Wife’s petition for enforcement of spousal maintenance was filed after the three-year statute

(noting that a recorded lien should alert those “searching the record to the fact that a lien has been filed on the subject property and that further inquiry should be made”).

Statutes in pari materia must be read together and all parts of the law on the same subject must be given effect, if possible.” , (citing Ariz. Gunite Builders, Inc. v. Cont’l Cas.

To stretch the resisting arrest statute to cover defendant’s act of fleeing is, in our opinion, violative of the rule that “[c]ourts will not read into a statute something that is not within the manifest intent of the Legislature as gathered from the statute itself.”