Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Ontiveros v. Borak, 667 P.2d 200.

328 citing documents.

Carrillo v. El Mirage Roadhouse, Inc. 793 P.2d 121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Carrillo v. El Mirage Roadhouse, Inc. 793 P.2d 121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Insurance Co. of North America v. Superior Court 784 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Insurance Co. of North America v. Superior Court 784 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Torres v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. 786 P.2d 939 Ariz. 1990
Torres v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. 786 P.2d 939 Ariz. 1990
McLEOD BY AND THROUGH SMITH v. Newcomer 785 P.2d 575 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
McLEOD BY AND THROUGH SMITH v. Newcomer 785 P.2d 575 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
(citing W. Prosser, Handbook on the Law of Torts, § 30, at 143 (4th ed. 1971)).
Gesina v. General Electric Co. 780 P.2d 1376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Gesina v. General Electric Co. 780 P.2d 1376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Dolezal v. Carbrey 778 P.2d 1261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Dolezal v. Carbrey 778 P.2d 1261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
citing W. Prosser, Law of Torts § 30, at 143 (4th ed. 1971).
Dixon v. Picopa Construction Co. 772 P.2d 1104 Ariz. 1989
Dixon v. Picopa Construction Co. 772 P.2d 1104 Ariz. 1989
Although this court does not favor bestowing immunities from tort liability for negligence on preferred classes of defendants, , , substantial policy considerations militate in favor of recognizing immunity when a tribe conducts tribal business through a tribal economic entity.
Hamman v. County of Maricopa 775 P.2d 1122 Ariz. 1989
Hamman v. County of Maricopa 775 P.2d 1122 Ariz. 1989
Professional Sports, Inc. v. Gillette Security, Inc. 766 P.2d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Professional Sports, Inc. v. Gillette Security, Inc. 766 P.2d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Terranova v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 761 P.2d 1029 Ariz. 1988
Terranova v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 761 P.2d 1029 Ariz. 1988
Transamerica Financial Corp. v. Superior Court 761 P.2d 1019 Ariz. 1988
Transamerica Financial Corp. v. Superior Court 761 P.2d 1019 Ariz. 1988
Transamerica argues that Rascon’s claim is unknown at common law; therefore, in the absence of express statutory authorization creating a private right of action under the Consumer Loan Act, none exists as a matter of law, citing Ontiveros v. Borak, *118 , 510 n. 3, , 210 n. 3 (1983).
JOHNSON BY JOHNSON v. Svidergol 757 P.2d 609 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
JOHNSON BY JOHNSON v. Svidergol 757 P.2d 609 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Law v. Superior Court of State of Ariz. 755 P.2d 1135 Ariz. 1988
Law v. Superior Court of State of Ariz. 755 P.2d 1135 Ariz. 1988
Duty is the “obligation, recognized by law, which requires [an actor] to conform to a particular standard of conduct in order to protect others against unreasonable risk of harm.” Markowitz, 146 Ariz. at 354 , 706 P.2d at 366
Duncan v. State 754 P.2d 1160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Duncan v. State 754 P.2d 1160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
1957 , 90 L.Ed.2d 365 (1986); , Restatement (Second) of Torts § 442(B) (1965).
Dorman v. Swift & Co. 757 P.2d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Dorman v. Swift & Co. 757 P.2d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Gehres v. City of Phoenix 753 P.2d 174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Gehres v. City of Phoenix 753 P.2d 174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Koory v. Western Casualty & Surety Co. 737 P.2d 388 Ariz. 1987
Koory v. Western Casualty & Surety Co. 737 P.2d 388 Ariz. 1987
Contempo Const. v. MT. STATES T. & T. CO. 736 P.2d 13 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Contempo Const. v. MT. STATES T. & T. CO. 736 P.2d 13 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Geronimo Hotel & Lodge v. Putzi 728 P.2d 1227 Ariz. 1986
Geronimo Hotel & Lodge v. Putzi 728 P.2d 1227 Ariz. 1986
We have long recognized “that the community property laws of Arizona are more like those of Washington than of any other state, and that the rulings of the courts of that state are very persuasive when similar questions arise under our law.” , ( , )
Sucanick v. Clayton 730 P.2d 867 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Sucanick v. Clayton 730 P.2d 867 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
54 , disapproved on other grounds
Del E. Webb v. Superior Court of Arizona 726 P.2d 580 Ariz. 1986
Del E. Webb v. Superior Court of Arizona 726 P.2d 580 Ariz. 1986
While plaintiff’s appeal was pending, , , both of which had retroactive application.
La Raia v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. 722 P.2d 286 Ariz. 1986
La Raia v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. 722 P.2d 286 Ariz. 1986
See, , , W. PROSSER & W. KEETON, THE LAW OF TORTS § 53 at 358 (5th ed. 1984).
Papastathis v. Beall 723 P.2d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Papastathis v. Beall 723 P.2d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Fund Manager, Public Safety Personnel Retirement System v. Arizona Department of Administration 725 P.2d 1127 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Fund Manager, Public Safety Personnel Retirement System v. Arizona Department of Administration 725 P.2d 1127 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Allen v. Southwest Salt Co. 718 P.2d 1021 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Allen v. Southwest Salt Co. 718 P.2d 1021 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
12 , 1 is unsound and obsolete; that it grants to employers a disfavored special immunity, , that the language “wilful disregard of the life, limb or bodily safety of employees” in § 23-1022(A) and Article 18, § 8 of the Constitution of Arizona indicates that a broader standard of liability should apply; and that the recent Ohio cases of Blanken *371 ship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemical