Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Ontiveros v. Borak, 667 P.2d 200.

328 citing documents.

Tennen v. Lane 716 P.2d 1031 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Tennen v. Lane 716 P.2d 1031 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
(evidence held to permit a finding that because the defendant was served too much liquor he caused an automobile collision; Brand v. J.H.
Rossell v. Volkswagen of America 709 P.2d 517 Ariz. 1985
Rossell v. Volkswagen of America 709 P.2d 517 Ariz. 1985
See, , (superseding cause is one which is unforeseeable and, viewed through hindsight, extraordinary); , (where the intervening negligent or intentional act was within the scope of the original risk created by defendant
Markowitz v. Arizona Parks Board 706 P.2d 364 Ariz. 1985
Markowitz v. Arizona Parks Board 706 P.2d 364 Ariz. 1985
Summerfield v. Superior Court, Maricopa Cty. 698 P.2d 712 Ariz. 1985
Keckonen v. Robles 705 P.2d 945 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Summerfield v. Superior Court, Maricopa Cty. 698 P.2d 712 Ariz. 1985
Keckonen v. Robles 705 P.2d 945 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
the Arizona Supreme Court held that tavern owners and other licensed sellers of intoxicating liquor may be held liable when they sell liquor to an intoxicated customer under circumstances where the licensee or his employees know or should know that such conduct creates an unreasonable risk of har
Reben v. Ely 705 P.2d 1360 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Reben v. Ely 705 P.2d 1360 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 697 P.2d 684 Ariz. 1985
Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 697 P.2d 684 Ariz. 1985
(legislative enactment of A.R.S.
Hebert v. Club 37 Bar 701 P.2d 847 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Hebert v. Club 37 Bar 701 P.2d 847 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
have changed the law so as to make the tavern keeper liable for this homicide.
Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters Insurance 682 P.2d 388 Ariz. 1984
Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters Insurance 682 P.2d 388 Ariz. 1984
We do not favor special rules of tort nonliability ----”
Donnelly Construction Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1292 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1292 Ariz. 1984
Donnelly Construction Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1292 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1292 Ariz. 1984
Fuenning v. Superior Court 680 P.2d 121 Ariz. 1983
Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPA 680 P.2d 121 Ariz. 1983
Fuenning v. Superior Court 680 P.2d 121 Ariz. 1983
Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPA 680 P.2d 121 Ariz. 1983
Brannigan v. Raybuck 667 P.2d 213 Ariz. 1983
Brannigan v. Raybuck 667 P.2d 213 Ariz. 1983
in order to reconsider the common law rule of tavern owners’ nonliability and to determine whether that rule should be retained as the common law of this state.